Energy News  
OutsideView: How Big Is The Defense Budget

Your latest aquisition
By Winslow Wheeler, UPI Outside View commentator
Washington (UPI) Jan 23, 2006
On Dec. 21, 2005, Congress passed a defense appropriations bill, which according to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, funded "defense spending" for the United States for the current fiscal year, 2006. But the impression that the $453 billion authorized in the bill constitutes America's defense budget for 2006 would be quite incorrect. Depending on how you count it, the numbers in the bill understate U.S. military and defense spending by more than $200 billion.

The total amount to be spent for the Department of Defense in 2006 is $13 billion to $63 billion more, the latter figure assuming full funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the now-annual "emergency" appropriations supplementals.

If you also count non-Department of Defense "national defense" costs, add another $21 billion and, if you count defense-related security costs, such as homeland security, the numbers touted by the appropriators are more than $200 billion wrong.

Having observed, and in past years participated in, the obscuration of just how much the United States actually spends for defense, this author believes it would assist the debate over the defense budget in this country by identifying its actual size.

The bill enacted in December had the title, "Making appropriations to the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006 and for other purposes." It was a little heavy on those -- which include a reported $40 billion annual budget for U.S. intelligence, some of it spent by agencies outside the pentagon -- and it did not comprise all the money the Defense Department will spend in 2006.

To peer through the opaqueness of congressional defense appropriations, it is necessary to run through the numbers; all the numbers.

The first step is to understand the "defense spending" bill, designated H.R. 2863, as enacted:

  • Division A of the bill appropriated $453.3 billion, but not all of it for the Department of Defense. $522 million went to the CIA for unclassified "intelligence community management" and to the Coast Guard. This makes the Department of Defense total in Division A $452.8 billion.

  • Division B, Title I, Chapter 1 of the bill adds $4.4 billion to the Department of Defense's budget for its expenses rescuing and relieving civilians and repairing other damage from Hurricane Katrina.

  • Chapter 7 of Division B adds another $1.4 billion to rebuild Department of Defense facilities damaged by Hurricane Katrina.

  • Division B, Title II, Chapter 2 adds $130 million for Department of Defense work preparing for a threatened Avian Flu pandemic.

  • Division B, Title III, Chapter 2 cuts the Department of Defense budget by $80 million in rescissions (cancelled spending). More importantly, Chapter 8 in this title cuts Department of Defense, and all other federal spending, except the Department of Veterans Affairs and "emergency" spending, by 1 percent "across the board."

    The cut is mandated to occur in every single program of the affected accounts, nothing is exempted. The reduction to Department of Defense is $4.0 billion.

    The actual total for the Department of Defense in the bill is $454.8 billion, over a billion more than what the appropriations committees implied.

    But that's not all for the Defense Department's budget. Add $12.2 billion for military construction.

    For reasons of politics and jurisdiction, Congress appropriates money for the Defense Department in two separate bills: the Department of Defense Appropriations bill and the Military Construction Appropriations bill, which these days is also wrapped in with other spending, such as the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    The "MilCon" bill funds military bases in the states and districts of almost every member of Congress. A major Capitol Hill activity is writing press releases for local newspapers about the goodies the senators and representatives add for their military facilities back home.

    They also write press releases about the goodies they add in the Defense appropriations bill. (Having two bills to write press releases about is better than one.)

    So, that gets Department of Defense spending for 2006 to $466.7 billion. That's all, right?

    Nope.

    Add about another $50 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    There is already $50 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan in the $466.7 billion appropriated in H.R. 2863.

    However, war spending in 2005 was over $100 billion, and most expect 2006 to cost at least as much. Nonetheless, Congress decided to provide just $50 billion for ongoing military operations, about enough money for the first six months of the fiscal year. It will run out in about March 2006.

    Before then, Congress and the president will need to add more, up to another $50 billion. It is that amount that Pentagon and congressional officials privately say they anticipate will be added in a "supplemental" appropriations request in early 2006.

    OK, that gets the total to $516.7 billion. Done now, right?

    Nope.

    There are other defense activities in the Department of Energy to keep America's nuclear arsenal reliable and effective and to develop new nuclear weapons. Add another $16.4 billion.

    There are also defense related costs in the Selective Service, the National Defense Stockpile, parts of the General Services Administration, and other miscellany. Add still another $4.7 billion.

    That gets the total to $537.8 billion. This figure constitutes the "National Defense" budget function (known to budget geeks as budget function "050") in presidential budget requests and congressional budget resolutions.

    You may also want to count even more spending, such as the costs of the Department of Homeland Security, which is certainly national defense in a generic sense.

    Add about $41 billion. You might also want to consider some of the human consequences of current and previous wars; add about $68 billion for Veterans Affairs.

    Also, consider adding the costs of reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan which counts in the State Department's budget, plus all the other costs for international security, diplomacy, and foreign aid, as administered by Condoleezza Rice; add about $23 billion.

    If you count all these costs, the total is $669.8 billion.

    This amount easily outdoes the rest of the world.

    In fact, if you count just the costs of the National Defense budget function, the approximate $538 billion we spend is $29 billion more than the $509 billion the entire rest of the world spends.

    Pick the number you believe to be most appropriate for "defense spending" in 2006. Presumably, you will not be using the $453 billion widely advertised by Congress and the press. Now, there can be an accurate debate on whether this budget is too large or too small. Please proceed.

    Source: United Press International

    Community
    Email This Article
    Comment On This Article

    Related Links
    Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
    Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com



    Memory Foam Mattress Review
    Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
    XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


    US Army Can Surge Troops To Meet Any Crisis
    Washington (AFP) Jan 18, 2006
    The US army can deploy at least 15 additional combat brigades in a crisis, even though a large part of its force is in Iraq, the service's civilian chief said Wednesday.







  • Portugal Pushes Back Deadline For International Wind Farm Bids
  • Energy Techs Cut Path To Reduced Emissions
  • Lithium-Ion Batteries Could Replace Standard Batteries In Hybrid Vehicles
  • Iran, Nigeria Lead To Oil Spike

  • Toshiba To Pay Double For Westinghouse
  • U.K. Opens Debate On Nuclear Power
  • Poll Reveals Half British Public Support Nuclear Future
  • U.S. Pushes For More Nuclear Power

  • What Is A Cloud
  • Getting To The TOPP Of Houston's Air Pollution
  • Scientists Seek Sprite Light Source

  • Deforestation Threatens Brazil's Pantanal Wetland
  • Nobel Laureate Blames East Africa Drought On Deforestation
  • Indonesia Faces More Disasters Unless Government Reforests
  • ESA Presents Space Solution To Montreal Forest Conference

  • Growing Crops To Cope With Climate Change
  • New Possibilities To Fight Pests With Biological Means
  • "Doomsday Vault" To House World's Seeds
  • Growing More Good Oil From The Sea

  • Eclectic Koizumi Tries Electric Sedan
  • GM Hires Russian Nuclear Scientists To Develop New Auto Technology
  • Japan Creates The World's Fastest Electric Sedan
  • Motorists To Pay 'Congestion' Charge Over Broader Swath Of London

  • Boeing Introduces New 737 Signals Intelligence Aircraft
  • Boeing Awarded Canadian CF-18 Avionics Upgrade
  • US Air Force Rates F-22A Raptor "Mission Capable"
  • Wedgetail Aircraft Delivered To Boeing Australia

  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program
  • Boeing-Led Team to Study Nuclear-Powered Space Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement