Energy News  
Britain Pre-Empting Nuclear Weapons Vote

Lobby group the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) argue that to replace Trident would promote proliferation, particularly at a time when Blair and the West is opposed to North Korea and Iran having atomic weapons.
by Staff Writers
London (AFP) Jan 16, 2007
An anti-nuclear group on Tuesday claimed the British government is already working on new warheads for the country's Trident missile nuclear deterrent even before parliament has voted on the matter. But the Ministry of Defence dismissed the claim by the Aldermaston Women's Peace Campaign (AWPC), saying it was simply wrong, while the ruling Labour Party said it was a conspiracy theory.

Members of parliament are due to decide in March whether to back Prime Minister Tony Blair in supporting plans to modernise the ageing weapons system.

Lawmakers on the House of Commons Defence Select Committee were told Tuesday that building work at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston, west of London, suggested the decision had already been taken.

In written evidence, the AWPC said "plans for warhead replacement are already well advanced".

"AWPC are calling on the government to come clean about the fact that at AWE Aldermaston, the Ministry of Defence has already started work on facilities to test, design and build new warheads, in advance of any parliamentary decision."

Committee member Kevan Jones, from Blair's governing Labour Party, said the claims were a "conspiracy theory".

An MoD spokesman told AFP the group had "got it wrong": warheads were not being replaced but work has been carried out recently to refurbish Aldermaston, whose facilities were last overhauled in the 1960s, he added.

Blair's proposals for Trident, including a new generation of nuclear submarines at a cost of up to 20 billion pounds (39.5 billion dollars), has been controversial.

Unilateral nuclear disarmament was Labour Party policy in the 1980s and many members are still opposed to retaining the nuclear deterrent.

Lobby group the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) argue that to replace Trident would promote proliferation, particularly at a time when Blair and the West is opposed to North Korea and Iran having atomic weapons.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Most Britons Want International Deal Banning All Nuclear Weapons
London (AFP) Jan 15, 2007
Some 64 percent of the British public believe that their government should back an international agreement banning all nuclear weapons, according to a new poll released Monday. The YouGov poll was published as the House of Commons Defence Select Committee began studying the government's case for modernizing its Trident nuclear missile deterrent ahead of a full parliamentary vote in March.







  • Ex-OPEC Chief Says Crude Oil Market Oversupplied
  • New Oil Shale Technology Under Development
  • Earth Biofuels To Acquire Controlling Interest In Ethanol Production Facility
  • Brookhaven Lab Scientists Stabilize Platinum Electrocatalysts For Use In Fuel Cells

  • Most Germans Oppose Nuclear Power Phase-Out
  • Iran To 'Honor Principles' Of Nuclear Control Treaty
  • Australia And China Ratify Nuclear Fuel Deal
  • Poland Moves Closer To Joining Baltic Nuclear Plant Project

  • U.S. wood-fired boilers cause concern
  • Climate Change Affecting Outermost Atmosphere Of Earth
  • TIMED Celebrates 5-Year Anniversary
  • Steering Clear Of Icy Skies

  • Sweden's Tree Line Moving At Fastest Rate For 7,000 Years
  • Soil Nutrients Shape Tropical Forests, Large-Scale Study Indicates
  • Health Of Brazilian Rainforest Depends On Dust From One Valley In Africa
  • Forests Can Also Raise Temperature Of Earth

  • California's Big Freeze Threatening Citrus Crops
  • 150,000 Trout Killed At Fish Farm In Storm Off Norway
  • Clear Strong Guidelines Needed For Marine Aquaculture
  • Cloned Food Safe Despite Consumer Fears

  • When Will Russian Cars Go To Detroit
  • New Battery Era Fires Up GM
  • What Will Russians Drive In 2010
  • Chinese Carmakers Head West

  • USGS Examines Environmental Impacts Of Aircraft De-Icers
  • China Gives Rare Glimpse Of Homegrown Jet Fighter
  • IATA Gives Cautious Welcome To EU Emissions Trading Plan
  • EU Proposes CO2 Emission Quotas For Airlines

  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear
  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement