![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Manila (AFP) Dec 16, 2008 Electronics manufacturers are finally taking climate change seriously but have been slow on the uptake, environmentalists said Tuesday. Companies have been going green by reducing power consumption and the toxic substances in their products but have been "slow to get serious about climate change", Greenpeace campaigner Beau Baconguis said. Her comments followed the launch of the group's Guide to Greener Electronics, now in its 10th edition. "While there have been some improvements on toxic and e-waste issues only a small number of companies are really leading on the response to energy and climate change issues," she said According to the guide mobile phone manufacturer Nokia leads the pack by sourcing 25 percent of its electricity from renewable energy sources and has committed to raising the figure to 50 percent by 2010. Other companies that have committed to renewable energy use include Fujitsu Siemens Computers (FSC), software giant Microsoft, Toshiba, Motorola and Philips. Greenpeace assessed the 18 biggest consumer electronics firms in the Philippines and gave half five out of a possible 10 points. However, only three of the nine companies with five points or better -- FSC, Philips and Sharp -- support the level of cuts in greenhouse gases needed to stave off man-made climate change. Philips and Hewlett-Packard "got top marks for committing to making absolute reductions in their own greenhouse gas emissions from the product manufacture and supply chain", Baconguis said. She noted that some firms that gained points for being energy-conscious "are still shirking their responsibilities on toxics". Those who scored well on the toxic chemical criteria set by Greenpeace for its guide and have products that are free of the worst substances include Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Toshiba, FSC and Sharp. Baconguis said Sony Ericsson "outranks Toshiba and Samsung" now that it has "prioritised its commitment to elimination of toxic chemicals in its manufacturing process". Overall, Motorola, Microsoft, Dell, Apple, Samsung, Nintendo and LG Electronics were still underperforming on climate change. Baconguis noted that these firms have "no plans to cut absolute emissions from their own operations and (provide) no support for the targets and timelines needed to avoid catastrophic climate change". She added that gaming console manufacturers like Nintendo and Microsoft had not improved their environmental practices and thus remained at the bottom of the pile. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links
![]() ![]() Australia Monday pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least five percent from 2000 levels by 2020 to help fight climate change, in a plan dismissed by critics as a "global embarrassment." |
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |