Energy News  
THE STANS
Why didn't Biden leave 2,500 troops in Afghanistan
By Paul HANDLEY
Washington (AFP) Aug 20, 2021

The Taliban's lightning-fast takeover of Afghanistan after President Joe Biden's decision to withdraw US troops by August 31 has critics asking: why didn't he just leave 2,500 troops there to fortify the now-fallen government?

That was how many US forces remained in the country when Biden took office in January, after his predecessor Donald Trump slashed their numbers from 15,000.

In appearances, the 2,500 troops and 16,000 US civilian contractors behind them, seemed to have been enough to keep the Afghan government in power in the year after Trump signed a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban insurgents on February 29, 2020.

Trump set a final pullout date of May 1, 2021, and even tried to speed that up.

While the Taliban stepped up attacks on Afghan government targets, their gains remained limited to non-strategic rural areas.

But, abiding to the agreement, their attacks on US and NATO forces meanwhile almost dried up. No US soldier was killed after Trump's deal.

Critics argue this showed that, when backed by a skeleton US force, Kabul could hold the line against the insurgents.

A battlefield stalemate was more desirable than a full Taliban victory, they said.

"We only had 2,500 troops there, light touch, no chaos, not a single American soldier killed in a year in combat," top Republican Senator Mitch McConnell said this week.

He urged Biden to increase support for Afghan troops rather than leave.

"If we let the Taliban dominate Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda return, it will resonate throughout the global jihadist movement," McConnell said.

- 'Third decade of conflict' -

Biden, who had long advocated exiting Afghanistan, launched a review after taking office.

In April, he announced his decision: the US would leave, but the departure deadline was pushed back three months, to the end of August.

The choice, Biden explained on August 16, "was either to follow through on that agreement or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban."

Without an exit date, he said, the Taliban would have resumed attacks on US targets.

"There was no status quo of stability without American casualties after May 1," he said.

The choice was "either following through on the agreement to withdraw our forces, or escalating the conflict and sending thousands more American troops back into combat in Afghanistan, lurching into the third decade of conflict."

- Aiming for equilibrium -

The impact of Biden's decision was stunning. The Taliban accelerated their campaign, Afghan troops stopped fighting, and government officials handed over their cities without resisting, until Kabul fell on August 15.

Military historian Max Boot, writing in the Washington Post, tied Biden's pullout decision directly to the disintegration of the Afghan forces.

"Many argued that a mere 2,500 US troops could make no difference," he wrote.

"The history of the past few months repudiates this view: The final Taliban offensive began only when the US troop pullout was nearly complete."

If the United States left 2,500 troops in the country and continued to provide air support to Afghan troops, it "was enough to maintain a tenuous equilibrium in which the Taliban made advances in the countryside, but every city remained in government hands," Boot said.

- Deeply dependent -

One thing Biden and critics agree on: the Afghan government and security forces were deeply dependent on the United States.

And with US military support, technical know-how and money gone, the Afghan security edifice crumbled.

Critics say US troops should have remained, much as the United States keeps a 2,500-strong force in Iraq, and larger numbers in Germany, South Korea and Japan, since World War II and the Korean War.

It would be worth preventing an Al-Qaeda-allied jihadist takeover of the country, they say.

Biden and his supporters say the continuing cost in American lives and money, supporting an openly corrupt an ineffective government in Kabul, would not justify it.

The outcome would be the same five years down the road, said Biden.

White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan argued that even when the Trump administration ramped up the US troop presence to 15,000 troops in 2017, Sullivan said, Afghan forces lost ground.

"What has unfolded over the past month has proven decisively that it would have taken a significant American troop presence, multiple times greater than what President Biden was handed, to stop a Taliban onslaught. And we would have taken casualties."


Related Links
News From Across The Stans


Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only


THE STANS
Facebook unveils curbs for Taliban-seized Afghanistan
San Francisco (AFP) Aug 20, 2021
Facebook released new security measures Thursday to protect users in Afghanistan after the lightning takeover of the country by the Taliban, who are already barred from the social media giant's platforms. Following recommendations from activists, journalists and civil society groups, the company said users can now shield their posts from people they don't know. Also, users of Facebook-owned Instagram in Afghanistan will receive notifications informing them of methods to protect their accounts. ... read more

Comment using your Disqus, Facebook, Google or Twitter login.



Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

THE STANS
Australia rejects climate targets despite damning UN report

China signals steady course after UN climate warning

US says cannot delay 'ambitious' action to protect climate

Areas of Iraqi province lose power after attack on pylons

THE STANS
An innovative process which prevents irreversible energy loss in batteries

PPPL-hosted workshop displays substantial progress in battling fusion disruptions

New technique for large-scale energy storage developed by polymer scientist

Smallest biosupercapacitor provides energy for biomedical applications

THE STANS
How do wind turbines respond to winds, ground motion during earthquakes?

For golden eagles, habitat loss is main threat from wind farms

Wind turbines can be clustered while avoiding turbulent wakes of their neighbors

Shell, France's EDF to build US offshore windfarm

THE STANS
Common solar tech can power smart devices indoors, NIST study finds

Perovskite solar cells: Interfacial loss mechanisms revealed

NASA spacewalk briefing to highlight new solar array installation

The dream artificial photosynthesis technology ventures from the laboratory

THE STANS
Framatome and BBF achieve testing milestone for medical sterilization transport system

Framatome acquires nuclear power systems division of RCM Technologies Canada Corp

Framatome's steam generator replacement expertise supports long-term operations in Canada

China nuclear reactor shut down for maintenance after damage

THE STANS
Maersk orders eight carbon-neutral container ships

Faster and cheaper ethanol-to-jet-fuel on the horizon

Turning hazelnut shells into potential renewable energy source

NASA awards $750,000 in competition to convert carbon dioxide into sugar

THE STANS
Green hydrogen: Focus on the catalyst surface

Survey forecasts increasing CO2 emissions from oil refineries

Study suggests hydraulic fracturing can impact surface water quality

UT researchers pushing innovative solution at DOE's Hydrogen Earth Shot kickoff

THE STANS
Drought makes its home on the range

UN hot on the trail of temperature records

Three in four say climate 'tipping points' close

Global warming begets more warming, new paleoclimate study finds









The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us.