Energy News  
Why The Pentagon Spends

File photo: US Pentagon.
by Viktor Litovkin
UPI Outside View Commentator
Moscow (UPI) Jul 03, 2006
The Pentagon's budget equals half of the world's defense spending. Why is the United States spending so much on its military? Sergei Rogov, director of the Institute of U.S. and Canadian Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences, told a RIA Novosti correspondent that at the height of the Cold War in the 1950s the United States spent about 10 percent of its GDP on military programs.

Another peak in military spending was during Ronald Reagan's presidency, 6.5 percent of GDP in 1985. When the Cold War ended, U.S. military expenditure dropped to 3 percent of GDP. It is now 4 percent and growing.

By 1998, the Pentagon budget had declined by 30 percent in real terms, and resumed growth when NATO and the U.S. started the war in Kosovo. The trend was boosted when President George W. Bush came to power.

Rogov said the main U.S. strategic objective after the Cold War had been to strengthen the country's status as the world's only superpower, the only pole in a unipolar world. This strategy rests on the power factor, which includes military might and non-military elements, primarily economic might.

The United States accounts for more than 20 percent of the world's GDP in terms of purchasing parity power, PPP, and for about 33 percent in terms of the exchange rate.

A closer look at the Pentagon budget shows that decisions to increase military spending were based on the assumption that the United States should exploit the situation created by the dissolution of the Soviet Union to surge ahead of the rest of the world in military terms, and to make rivalry with it impossible in the 21st century. The United States views China as its prime rival.

The right-wing hard-liners in the Bush administration, as well as Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, argue that the United States could easily resume the heavy military spending of the Cold War period to maintain the country's position as the world's only superpower.

Two-thirds of the U.S. budget consists of so-called mandatory items, such as social security, healthcare and education, where spending is indexed to inflation. Congress does not vote on appropriations to these programs because money is appropriated automatically. Therefore, only one-third of the American budget is annually redistributed. This part is divided almost equally between military and non-military spending.

To keep raising defense spending, the administration will have to cut the protected items. But American society is not prepared for this. Attempts made toward this end provoked the protests of the opposition and the ruling Republican Party, who know that the loss of traditional services would cost them votes in the congressional elections in the fall of 2006 and the 2008 presidential election.

Rogov said U.S. military spending included the budget of the Department of Defense and the military part of expenditures of the Department of Energy. There is also the Department of Veterans Affairs, which provides patient care and federal benefits to veterans and their dependents, and pays about half of military pensions. In all, its expenses add about $50 billion to the defense budget.

In addition, the government has to repay debts which are mostly connected with deficit financing -- a planned excess of expenditure over income -- of military spending in the past.

The U.S. Congress has approved the appropriation of $512 billion for the DOD. The military part of the DOE's budget should add $15 billion-$20 billion, plus $50 billion for the Department of Veterans Affairs and more than $40 billion in allocations for internal security and the part of the national debt that is associated not with social programs but with Vietnam and other wars.

Taken together, total U.S. military spending amounts to $650 billion or more, which is why the federal budget deficit amounts to 3-4 percent of GDP, to be paid for by future generations.

Viktor Litovkin is a defense commentator for the RIA Novosti news agency. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.

Source: United Press International

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Russian Academy of Sciences
Follow the first techonology war of the 21st century at SpaceWar.com
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


European Defence Market Introduces Code Of Conduct
Brussels, Belgium (SPX) Jul 03, 2006
A new era for defence procurement in the European Union begins on 1 July with the introduction of a regime designed to increase transparency and competition in the European Defence Equipment Market, offer armed forces and taxpayers better value for money, broaden business opportunities for defence companies and strengthen the global competitiveness of the European industry.







  • Environmental Fury Over US Bill To Expand Oil And Gas Drilling
  • First Global Lighting Study Is Released
  • Germany Now Has Two Energy Plans
  • Pentagon Sued For Blocking New Wind Power Plants

  • Russia Plans Atomic Energy Expansion
  • Second US Congressional Panel Backs US-India Nuclear Deal
  • Italy To Face EU Court For Failing To Adopt Nuclear Plans
  • US Congress Expected To Clear Indian Nuclear Deal In First Vote

  • California's Model Skies
  • ESA Picks SSTL To Develop Atmospheric CO2 Detector
  • Faster Atmospheric Warming In Subtropics Pushes Jet Streams Toward Poles
  • Atmospheric Warming Expanding The Tropics

  • World Bank Vows To Improve Forestry Program In Cambodia
  • Tropical Forest CO2 Emissions Tied To Nutrient Increases
  • Chechen Environment In Danger Say WWF And Russian Officials
  • Midsummer Fest Bonfires Banned In Estonian Forests

  • Food-Crop Yields In Future Greenhouse-Gas Conditions Lower Than Expected
  • Millions Hungry Despite Good Harvests In Southern Africa
  • Scientists To Track Fish Stocks With Underwater Arrays And Satellites
  • Conservation Offers Financial Rewards For Cattle Ranchers

  • Back Middle Car Seat Maybe Un-Cool But It Is The Safest Car Seat
  • Mobile Phones Provide Another Reason To Hate SUVs
  • Self-Powered Sensors To Watch Over Hydrogen Cars
  • Activists Press Ford On Environmental Policies

  • Innovative Solutions Make Transportation Systems Safer Secure and Efficient
  • Joint Strike Fighter Is Not Flawed Finds Australian Government
  • Globemaster Airdrops Falcon Small Launch Vehicle
  • Terma Selected To Manufacture Key Components Of F-35 JSF

  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear
  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement