Energy News  
We're Ready To Modify ABM Treaty: Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin casts his ballots at the polling station, 16 December, 2001. Voters in Moscow and in 11 other regions went to the polls on Sunday for local elections. Residents of Moscow and the Moscow region were to elect local parliaments, and three Moscow suburbs were to vote for their district councils. AFP/TASS Pool Photo

London (AFP) Dec 17, 2001
Russia is prepared to modify the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) to avoid a unilateral withdrawal by Washington, President Vladimir Putin said in an interview published here Monday.

"We were prepared for certain modifications of the treaty," Putin told the Financial Times in an interview given at the Kremlin just hours after the US announcement that it was pulling out of the treaty with Russia.

US President George W. Bush announced that the United States was pulling out of the treaty in order to deploy a missile defense system.

Despite opposition from Russia, China and key US allies to abandoning the cornerstone of Cold War arms control efforts, Bush said he had given Moscow the six months' formal notice the accord requires for withdrawal.

"We asked to be given the specific parameters that stood in the way of US desires to develop defensive systems. We were fully prepared to discuss (them). But nothing specific was given to us," Putin said in the interview.

"We heard only insistent requests for bilateral withdrawal from the treaty. To this day I fail to understand that insistence," he told the British paper.

He stressed that Moscow was responding to the US move in a "very calm, very constructive way".

President Bush "always does what he says, and in that respect he is a reliable partner," the Russian leader added.

On the matter of Moscow's bid for a full say in NATO affairs, Putin said he remained sanguine: "All disappointments and frustrations are born out of undue expectations".

In public statements last Thursday, Putin described the US decision to scrap the ABM treaty as a "mistake", while proposing a reduction in nuclear arms on the part of the Cold War rivals.

But Washington and Moscow cannot agree on the methods of reducing their nuclear stockpiles. The United States wants to do it by an informal accord, while Russia wants a properly drawn up treaty.

"We believe the accords we reach should be translated into legal treaty form. They should be transparent, they should be verifiable," he told the Financial Times.

Asked whether the ABM issue had harmed bilateral relations Putin replied: "If relations between Russia and the West, Russia and NATO, Russia and the US continue to develop in the spirit of partnership and even of alliance, then no harm will be done."

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
Military Space News at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Canada To Seek International Pact Banning Weapons In Space
Ottawa (AFP) Jan 11, 2006
Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin will seek an international pact to ban weapons in space if his Liberals are returned to power in a January 23 election, according to the party platform.







  • More Reliable Power Sought

  • Secret British Report Calls For Nuclear Power Phaseout
  • Britain Joins Armenia And Bulgaria On Nuclear Watch List
  • Ireland Steps Up Campaign Against British Nuclear Plant
  • Civilian Nuclear Industries Under Siege Of New Concerns









  • Boeing Sonic Cruiser Completes First Wind Tunnel Tests



  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement