![]() |
Washington (AFP) Nov 07, 2005 The US Supreme Court said Monday that it would rule on the legality of special military courts set up for "war on terror" detainees after a former driver to Osama bin Laden made the biggest challenge yet to the US administration. The court said it would examine the legality of the military tribunals in early 2006, though the US Defense Department said it still wanted to start the first trial this month of accused "Australian Taliban" David Hicks. "We're assessing the decision of the Surpreme Court," Pentagon spokesman, Bryan Whitman, said. Whitman said he was unaware of any plan to postpone Hicks' trial. The Supreme Court challenge was launched by lawyers for Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni who like Hicks has been held at the controversial camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba since 2002. Hamdan and Hicks were first detained in Afghanistan in late 2001. Hamdan has been charged with conspiracy to stage attacks on civilians, murder and terrorism. He has denied the charges. He is one of four inmates to have had preliminary hearings before the special military tribunals at Guantanamo, which have been widely criticized by human rights groups, though the US government has insisted they are fair and legal. A federal court rule in November last year that the military commissions would violate Hamdan's rights and that he should not be tried until a proper body had decided whether he was a prisoner-of-war. But a US appeals court ruled on July 15 that the military trials were legal. The three-judge court included John Roberts, who was recently appointed the Supreme Court's new chief justice. The July ruling was seen as a victory for President George W. Bush's administration and its treatment of detainees from the US war on terrorism. The Appeals Court said that the 1949 Geneva Convention on prisoner of war rights did not apply to Hamdan and that the US Congress had authorized the military commission. Due to his role in the appeals court decision, Roberts will have to recuse himself from Hamdan's Supreme Court hearing, leaving the decision to eight of the nine judges. Eugene Fidell, a jurist and member of the National Institute of Military Justice, said the court's decision to have a hearing will likely cause the suspension of the military trials of other detainees, including Hicks. Hicks, whose trial is due to start on November 18, is accused of fighting alongside the Taliban against US-led forces who invaded after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. The Muslim covert from Adelaide, Australia is facing charges of attempted murder and aiding the enemy after allegedly training at Al-Qaeda-linked military camps. Fidell, a critic of the procedures put in place by the Bush administration, welcomed the court's decision to take the case. "It's important to take it now," he told AFP. "Almost regardless to how it comes out, it's important to send a message around the world that the issues presented in this case are very important and they are getting attention at the highest level of our governmental system, including the courts." Fifteen detainees at Guantanamo have now been designated for military commission trials. Four have been formally charged, incluiding Hamdan, Hicks, another Yemeni and a Sudanese man. Around 500 detainees are held at the US military detention facility, which was set up in 2002 soon after the start of the US-led offensive against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan in the fall of 2001. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express The Long War - Doctrine and Application
Atlanta GA (SPX) Dec 09, 2005Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) announced Thursday it was awarded two contracts in support of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Public Health Informatics' BioSense program. |
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |