Energy News  
US Submarine Base Saved From Closure

File aerial photo of the the Submarine Base New London.

Washington (AFP) Aug 24, 2005
Citing rising threats in Asia, an independent commission voted Wednesday to save the premier submarine base on the US east coast from closure, striking down a Pentagon recommendation.

The Pentagon had called for the closure of the Submarine Base New London in Connecticut as part of a sweeping plan to close or realign hundreds of US military facilities to save money and eliminate excess capacity.

The Base Realignment and Closure Commission voted 7 to one with one abstention to strike down the Pentagon's recommendation, which would have dispersed the base's 17 fast attack submarines to bases in Virginia and Georgia.

The commission also voted to keep open the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Maine, in the first of three days of decisions on 837 military facilities, including 33 major bases, recommended for closure or realignment.

The commission voted to close a number of army bases on the Pentagon's list, including Forts McPherson and Gillem in Georgia; Fort Monroe, Virginia; and Fort Monmouth, New Jersey.

The Pentagon's recommendation on the New London submarine base was "complicated by ... the threat data presented to us on many occasions of other world events that are taking place, particularly in Asia," said retired general Lloyd Newton in presenting the motion.

"I find it would be a big mistake to close this base at the present time," he said.

Closure of the submarine base had been sharply opposed by retired naval officers, particularly submariners who worried that it signaled a decline for their branch of the navy.

Former president Jimmy Carter, a former submariner, wrote the commission a letter opposing the base's closure.

It also met stiff opposition from some members of Congress because of its potential impact on the economy of the northeast. The base employs some 8,000 military personnel and civilians.

Anthony Principi, the commission chairman, said the base's co-location with Electric Boat, which builds the nuclear powered submarines, would be difficult to replicate elsewhere.

"Emerging regional threats that we face in the world today leaves uncertain the force structure of nuclear submarines in the future," he said before the vote.

"If we close New London down we'll never get it back," he said.

The Pentagon argued that the military's requirements for 55 attack submarines could be absorbed on the US east coast by existing submarine bases at Norfolk, Virginia and Kings Bay, Georgia.

James Hansen, the panel's lone dissenter, noted that the fleet of US attack submarines has dropped from just over 100 during the Cold War to about 55 today.

He said the navy's chief of operations told the commission that the service could make do with 41 submarines.

"You find yourself in a position (where) you got a lot of parking space you're just not going to use," he said.

The commission will submit its final decisions to President George W. Bush who must either accept or reject the list in its entirety. If Bush accepts the changes, they will go to Congress for an up or down vote.

In past rounds of base closures, BRAC commissions have typically endorsed about 85 percent of the Pentagon's recommendations.

US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld defended the Pentagon's closure list on Tuesday as an intricate, two-and-a-half year effort to mesh base closures with a broader reorganization of the military and the return from Europe and Asia of some 70,000 US troops.

The Pentagon's recommendations "didn't come out of midair. And there wasn't an ounce of politics in any aspect of it," Rumsfeld said.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
Military Space News at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Space Group To Activate New Unit
Colorado Springs CO (SPX) Jan 6, 2006
Air Force Reserve Command's 310th Space Group will travel deeper into the space program when it activates a new unit Jan. 7. Headquarters Reserve National Security Space Institute will be a Reserve associate unit to the National Security Space Institute in Colorado Springs, Colo. The institute is the Department of Defense's focal point for providing education about space power in joint warfighting.







  • UPI Market Update: The End Of Cheap Oil?
  • Oil Prices Climb On US Crude Stocks Release, Hurricane Fears
  • Do Crude Prices Have Upper Limits?
  • Analysis: India-China May Work On Oil

  • South China Province Picks Likely Site For Fourth Nuclear Plant
  • U.K. Decommissioning More Expensive Than Expected
  • The Ecological Effects Of The Chernobyl Disaster
  • Nuclear Contamination Found In Four States

  • Getting To The TOPP Of Houston's Air Pollution
  • Scientists Seek Sprite Light Source



  • Agriculture Reviving In Aceh After Tsunami: Scientists
  • Analysis: EU Farm Aid Under Spotlight
  • Global Warming To Boost Scots Farmers
  • New Bacteria Screening Technique May Aid Food Safety

  • Mitsubishi, TEPCO To Team Up On Electric Car: Report
  • Intelligent System Offers Safer Tunnel Traffic For Europe
  • The Driving Doctor: Take Time To Observe
  • Networking: 'Smart Highways' Emerging

  • GE, Rolls-Royce Win 2.4 Billion Dollar Joint Strike Engine Deal
  • Energia Makes A Big Show At MAKS
  • ESA At Russia's Annual MAKS Expo
  • Airport Experts Gather At NASA Ames To Plan For Future

  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program
  • Boeing-Led Team to Study Nuclear-Powered Space Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement