 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
US Military Must Stand Ready To Face Threats Says Gates
Washington (AFP) Feb 07, 2007 The United States has to boost its military machine to meet all threats and not just the war in Iraq, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday. "We need the full range of military capabilities. We need ... the ability for regular force-on-force conflicts, because we don't know what's going to develop in places like Russia and China, in North Korea, in Iran and elsewhere," he told the House of Representatives Armed Services committee. He was defending the 2008 budget unveiled on Monday by US President George W. Bush which called for a mammoth 716.5 billion dollars to fund wars in Iraq and Afganistan as well as to pay for a major expansion of the US military. Bush has pushed a new strategy to curb the violence in Iraq, which calls for 21,500 extra troops to be deployed in the country to secure the capital Baghdad, as well as troubled Anbar province. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine General Peter Pace, told the House panel that while China posed no immediate threat, "we still need to watch what they're doing. Their recent anti-satellite test if of great concern." Pace said the US military was preparing for several scenarios of regional crises. "We looked at the possibility of renewed conflict in Korea; we looked at the possibility of one other potential event in Pacific region, which I'd prefer not to say publicly; and we looked at the possibility of one additional event in the Iraq region, using the plans that are on the shelf ..." On Iraq, Gates said, as on Tuesday at a separate hearing in the Senate, that he was beginning to look at contingency plans should the latest strategy fail. "I have asked that we begin to look at other contingencies and other alternatives," he said Wednesday. "I think that the Iraqis have a very good understanding at this point that their participation in this role and their role in this activity is critical to its success and that if they do not fulfil their commitments, that the United States as you quoted me as saying, is going to have to look at other alternatives and consequences," he said. That could "include withholding financial assistance and other kinds of things, but also withholding forces," he added.
Source: Agence France-Presse Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Space Foundation Says NASA Budget Proposal Inadequate To Assure US Leadership In Space
Colorado Springs CO (SPX) Feb 07, 2007Following [the] release of the President's FY2008 Budget, Space Foundation President and Chief Executive Officer Elliot G. Pulham said, "Given the many demands upon the U.S. federal budget, most notably for war costs, entitlement programs, and homeland security, it is admirable that the administration's proposed FY2008 budget preserves a modicum of funding for the nation's space programs - civil, commercial and national security. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
