 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
US Court To Rule On Pivotal Case On Global Warming
Washington (AFP) Jun 26, 2006 The US Supreme Court decided on Monday it will weigh whether the federal government must regulate emissions of new cars to combat global warming as demanded by environmental groups and some state and city authorities. The case could open the way for the high court to deliver a crucial ruling on how the US government enforces environmental laws. Since 2003, 12 US states, several cities and a dozen environmental groups have waged a legal battle against the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which has chosen not to curb greenhouse emissions on new cars. The EPA maintains that the federal Clean Air Act does not address global climate change and that carbon dioxide is not defined as a pollutant under the law. The administration of President George W. Bush has advocated voluntary controls instead of mandatory limits on emissions. The plaintiffs in the suit, which include the states of California, Massachusetts and New York, argue that the Clean Air Act obliges the EPA to regulate emissions from cars and power plants such as carbon dioxide and three other gases linked to global warming. Carbon dioxide and similar emissions are believed to trap heat in the earth's atmosphere, causing global temperatures to rise. A federal appeals court in Washington ruled in July 2005 that the EPA's policy was justified, saying the agency was not legally required to regulate causes of global warming and that scientific evidence was lacking to support such measures. In papers filed with the Supreme Court, the US government called the lawsuit "speculative" as it remained unclear if global warming could be traced to emissions from new cars and even if the link was proven, it was not clear that requiring more fuel efficient cars would have a major impact on climate change. The issue of global warming could be better addressed through international efforts supported by the United States, the government said. The case will have a "far-reaching" effect on the US approach to global warming, according to the environmental group Sierra Club. "The Bush administration has continually tried to say that it's not their job to fight global warming. In fact, they have both the legal and moral responsibility to tackle global warming pollution," David Bookbinder, senior attorney for the Sierra Club, said in a statement.
Source: Agence France-Presse Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links - Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation
A Sign Of Global Warming Under The Olive Tree
Exeter, England (UPI) Jun 26, 2006Scientists say global warming has advanced to the stage where it is possible to plant an olive grove in Britain. That nation's first olive grove has been planted in Devon, adding weight to several studies that have suggested olives, vines and other warm-climate plants will be able to flourish in a substantially warmer Britain, The Independent reported. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
