Energy News  
US Brass Doesn't Shine To Iraqi War - But Will Obey Orders

the big bad wolf playing with his little gun - AFP File photo

 Washington (AFP) May 24, 2002
High-ranking Pentagon officials said Friday they were ready to execute a campaign against Baghdad, as US media reported a lack of equipment and resources to expand the US war on terrorism to Iraq.

"Your military is ready today to execute whatever mission the civilian leadership of this country gives us to do ... there is an open dialogue between the civilian leadership and the military leadership," Marines General Peter Pace said Friday.

Pace was speaking after several US newspapers reported that top ranking generals are opposed to attacking Iraq in the near-term future, saying that it would be a heavy burden on US troops, equipment and logistics.

According to a New York Times report, the generals say the United States is already stretched by its operations in Afghanistan, the Balkans and the Philippines.

Although the administration of US President George W. Bush would love to topple the regime of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, the White House has no plans to attack the country right now.

"I have no war plans on my desk, and it's the truth," Bush said at a joint press conference in Berlin Thursday with German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder.

But Bush said the Iraqi leader remained a threat as a "dictator who's gassed his own people" and who is working to acquire weapons of mass destruction.

In the meantime, European allies of the United States are opposed to a war aimed at forcing Saddam out of power, as are many Arab allies of the United States -- accusing it of being too supportive of Israel in the Middle East conflict.

US generals and admirals say the United States, because of that situation, would find it more difficult to establish a coalition in any impending war on Iraq than during the 1990-1991 Gulf War, according to USA Today.

More specifically, however, overstretching of troops is of even greater concern to the military bosses.

According to the Washington Post, General Tommy Franks, commander of operations in Afghanistan and in the Gulf, estimates it would require 200,000 troops for the United States to intervene in Iraq -- higher than other experts' figures.

That is half the number deployed after Iraq invaded Kuwait 11 years ago.

And some 60,000 Americans were mobilized for Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Around 7,000 US soldiers are still stationed there.

Meanwhile, General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and army, navy, air force and marines commanders have voiced two primary concerns to civilian leaders of the military, including Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, according to the Post.

The first is linked to the possible use of chemical warfare by Saddam Hussein, who is suspected of having accumulated large numbers of deadly biological weapons.

The second worry is over potential heavy casualties that could happen during bloody urban warfare.

Still other military leaders want to know who might be the successor to Saddam to know how worthwhile it would be to oust the Iraqi leader.

Still other military brass are critical of their colleagues' overcautious stance, according to The New York Times Friday.

However, the Times, citing officials, reported that a top-secret Pentagon war game had "revealed that expanding the campaign against terrorism to a country like Iraq would place severe strains on personnel and cause deep shortages of certain critical weapons."

"Even so, the computer-simulated exercise found that the armed forces could still wage and win a major regional conflict while maintaining other global commitments," the Times article said.

"The highly classified war game uncovered worrisome shortages in military equipment, including that used for surveillance and electronic-jamming, as well as refueling tankers and transport aircraft that would be required to conduct a war on the scale of attacking Iraq or North Korea," it added.

Defense Secretary Rumsfeld said Friday he was not so stupid as to announce any "serious shortage" of anything. "One of the lessons learned is that from conflict to conflict the rate of usage of different things changes," he told reporters.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
The Long War - Doctrine and Application



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


NGC Team Receives Third Phase Contract For Portable Bio-Warfare Detection Program
Baltimore MD (SPX) Jan 10, 2006
A Northrop Grumman-led team has been selected by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to continue development of the handheld isothermal silver standard sensor (HISSS), a portable system used for identifying biological-warfare agents, including bacteria, viruses and toxins.







  • Reforms Urged In Arab Countries To Attract Energy Investments
  • Nasa To Test Microwave Effects On Plant Growth
  • New Research Turns Sewage Farms Into Power Plants
  • R&D The Key To A Sustainable, Clean Energy Future

  • Finland Approves First Nuclear Reactor Since Chernobyl
  • Finland To Spur Global Renaissance For Nuclear Power?
  • European Nuclear Body Backs Lithuania Building New Reactor
  • US House Backs National Nuclear Dump Project









  • Boeing Signs Technology Development Agreement With JAI For Work On Sonic Cruiser
  • Boeing Sonic Cruiser Completes First Wind Tunnel Tests



  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement