Energy News  
South Korea Pushing US Relocation

President and First Lady Bush on a recent visit to South Korea.
by Jong-Heon Lee
UPI Correspondent
Seoul (UPI) May 05, 2006
South Korea has pressed ahead with the planned relocation of U.S. bases in the country, cracking down on local residents and anti-American activists. Some 13,000 riot police were mobilized Thursday to break up protesters who occupied a school complex in an area designated for expanded U.S. military facilities, resulting in violent clashes and injuries.

Just after the forced expulsion, the defense minister issued a statement vowing to carry out the relocation, calling it necessary to deter North Korea and South Korea's balanced territorial development.

But civic groups and some lawmakers blasted the forced expulsion, pledging all-out campaigns against the construction of new American facilities in Pyeongtaek, 45 miles south of Seoul.

The expansion of Camp Humphreys in Pyeongtaek is part of the repositioning of U.S. bases in South Korea.

Under a 2004 accord, the United States will redeploy frontline U.S. ground forces to south of Seoul, in one of the biggest relocations of American forces in the country since the 1950-53 Korean War.

In the land swap deals, the United States is required to gradually hand back 34 of its 41 military bases across the country by 2011; in return South Korea will assign alternative land for the reconsolidation of U.S. troops.

South Korea has offered 12 million square meters of land in the Pyeongtaek area for an expanded U.S. base to be built by 2008.

Under the plan, another 5,000 troops in the Seoul-based headquarters of the U.S. Forces Korea would move into Pyeongtaek. The high-profile presence of the Yongsan Garrison in central Seoul has been a constant source of anti-American protests.

The relocation is part of a U.S. global troop realignment plan to transform its fixed units worldwide into mobile, capability-based forces under its Global Posture Review plan to better deal with new security threats such as terrorism and rogue states.

The relocation plan has triggered security jitters in South Korea as the 2nd Infantry Division, made up of some 50 percent of the 32,500 U.S. forces stationed in South Korea, has long been regarded as a "tripwire" that could automatically lead to U.S. involvement in the case of an invasion by North Korea.

The realignment plan has also caused protests by local residents calling for more financial compensation and anti-American activists opposed to the U.S. military presence.

Some residents -- backed by anti-U.S. activists -- refused to leave their homes on the site of the planned expansion to protest the government's procurement of the area. They occupied a school situated on the land in protest.

After attempts to persuade the residents to leave their homes failed, the government mobilized 10,000 riot police to evict protesters.

Clashes erupted as police armed with batons stormed the elementary school compound where hundreds of protesters were holed up.

Protesters hurled rocks and wielded sticks to keep the police at bay, shouting slogans such as "Stop expanding the U.S. military base in Pyeongtaek No war on the Korean peninsula!" But they were overwhelmed and arrested by baton-wielding riot police. More than 20 police and protesters were injured during the scuffle.

Shortly after the forced eviction, troops, backed by helicopters, began establishing a barbed-wire fence around a vast track of paddy fields to secure the expansion of the camp.

The Defense Ministry sent some 3,000 troops, including 600 military engineers, and about 700 civilian security personnel and heavy equipment to build the fence.

In a statement, Defense Minister Yoon Kwang-ung said his government could not delay the relocation program because it was agreed upon by the two counties and endorsed by parliament.

"We cannot afford to let this state project drift further. We decided to designate the area the government has purchased so far as a military facility protection zone," Yoon said.

"I feel very, very sorry to see a social controversy arising over the base relocation plan, a national project agreed on between Seoul and Washington, and later approved by the National Assembly," he said.

But officials are concerned that the Pyeongtaek area may serve as a new site for anti-U.S. movements in the country because the protest against the relocation was backed by anti-American civic activists and students.

The Democratic Labor Party held a press conference to call for the suspension of the U.S. military expansion plan and dismissal of the defense minister for the clashes. Lim Jeong-in, a ruling Uri Party lawmaker, also asked for the withdrawal of the troops from Pyeongtaek.

Under a mutual defense treaty, since the 1950-1953 Korean War some 32,000 American troops have been stationed in South Korea against North Korea's 1.1-million-strong army.

Source: United Press International

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
- Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Pakistans Military Blast Indian War Game Comments
Islamabad (AFP) May 05, 2006
A Pakistani military official Thursday criticized an Indian commander's comments after he said an ongoing military exercise was aimed at dismembering its arch-rival in the event of a war. The "irresponsible" statement did not bode well for the ongoing peace process between Pakistan and India, the official said.







  • Japan To Capture CO2 At Australian Power Plant In World First
  • Lives Could Be Saved By Switching Household Fuels
  • Researchers Focus On Spacecraft Power Storage
  • Oil prices near 74 dollars on Bolivia, Iran fears

  • Defects Found In Reactor At Controversial Bulgarian Nuclear Plant
  • The Real Toll Of Chernobyl Remains Hidden In Background Noise
  • Russian Scientists Downplay Fallout From Chernobyl Disaster
  • Twenty Years On Effects From Chernobyl Disaster Go On

  • In The Baltics Spring And Smoke Is In The Air
  • UNH And NASA Unlock The Puzzle Of Global Air Quality
  • Project Achieves Milestone In Analyzing Pollutants Dimming The Atmosphere
  • The 'Oxygen Imperative'

  • Diverse Tropical Forests Defy Metabolic Ecology Models
  • Developing Nations May Save The Tropical Forest
  • Imported Dream Tree Becomes A Nightmare For Kenya
  • Monkey-Dung Offers Clues About Land-Use, Wildlife Ecology

  • Alternatives To The Use Of Nitrate As A Fertiliser
  • Researchers Trawl The Origins Of Sea Fishing In Northern Europe
  • Greens Happy As EU Tightens GMO Testing
  • Killing Wolves May Not Protect Livestock Efficiently

  • Prototype For Revolutionary One-Metre Wide Vehicle Is Developed
  • Highly Realistic Driving Simulator Helps Develop Safer Cars
  • Research On The Road To Intelligent Cars
  • Volvo Promises Hybrid Truck Engines Within Three Years

  • Test Pilot Crossfield Killed In Private Plane Crash
  • Aerospace Industry Slow To Embrace New MEMS Technologies
  • BAE Systems To Sell Airbus Stake, EADS Likely Buyers
  • DaimlerChrysler And Lagardere Cut Stake In EADS

  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear
  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement