![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Washington (AFP) May 27, 2000 - Top US defense experts have concluded that a sea-based missile defense system could be built with existing technology as the Clinton administration struggles to find a way to create credible land-based missile defenses, the Washington Post reported Saturday. The system would be an upgraded version of the US Navy's Aegis air defenses already deployed on 84 cruisers and destroyers, said the Post, citing a classified Defense Department study. The report by the Defense Department's Ballistic Missile Defense Organization was expected to add fuel to the debate over the need for a land-based national missile defense system, which has already failed several key tests and was expected to cost up to 60 billion dollars. Clinton is to decide later this year whether to deploy a land-based defensive shield starting in 2005, a plan, which has raised ire in Europe, China and Russia. A White House spokesman defended the land-based system, which would place 20 interceptor missiles in the state of Alaska in its first phase. "Our proposed national missile defense system is the fastest, most affordable, most technologically mature approach," spokesman P.J. Crowley was quoted by the Post as saying. The short and medium ranges of the existing sea-based system "are not capable of protecting all 50 states from strategic ballistic missiles," he added. But several experts including former CIA director John Deutch have argued that a sea-based system should be deployed while the land-based system is being debated. One of its advantages, according to the Post, is that it could be deployed against specific nations -- in ships anchored off North Korea, for example -- thus minimizing diplomatic fallout of the broader land-based defense systems. "It is much easier to put a lid on North Korea ... than it is to put an umbrella over the whole of the United States," Richard Garwin, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, was quoted as saying. It was not immediately clear whether a sea-based system would be in compliance with the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The United States is seeking to amend the treaty to allow deployment of land-based national defenses. Copyright 2000 AFP. All rights reserved. The material on this page is provided by AFP and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. CommunityEmail This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Space
![]() ![]() The successful launch Thursday of India's heaviest satellite from spaceport of Kourou in French Guyana may have boosted the country's space research efforts to yet another level, but it has also lifted the spirits of at least three Direct-To-Home televisions broadcasters, one of which has been waiting for years to launch its services in India. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |