 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Satellite Operator Group Decries RFI Problems
Washington DC (SPX) Oct 13, 2004 The continual drive by satellite network operators to cut or control costs is contributing to a rise in radio frequency interference (RFI) incidents and adversely impacting the satellite communications industry, according to an industry group dedicated to combating or mitigating the effects of RFI in satellite transmissions. Representatives of over 30 satellite operators, equipment makers and transmission identification companies gathered September 29 and 30 in St. Petersburg Beach, Florida for the annual meeting of the Satellite Users Interference Reduction Group (SUIRG). Among the many examples cited for causes of RFI incidents experienced by their companies were spurious transmissions, faulty or dirty cables/connections, VHF radio interference with a satellite uplink chain and the increase of uplinkers with minimal technical training, particularly in emerging regions of the globe. According to many of the satellite operator representatives, tracking down and identifying the source of RFI can range from weeks to months of man-hours. The increase in troubleshooting service load and related reduction in bandwidth availability during interference incidents is placing an increasingly onerous cost burden on satellite operators. This burden is reflected in transponder sale or lease prices, which are ultimately shouldered by network operators and customers alike. The time and costs expended identifying the geo-location of interference sources could be considerably reduced if transmit signal identification was implemented, members agreed. Providing incentives to satellite network managers to invest in quality equipment, rigorous maintenance and professional training for their uplink technicians would benefit the entire industry, according to Robert W. Ames, Jr., SUIRG president. "Interference problems with satellite transmissions hurt our entire industry, not just from a cost standpoint, but also from the perspective of our reliability reputation at a time when competitive pressures from fiber are at an all time high," he said. In addition to executives of major satellite operators Intelsat, PanAmSat, Inmarsat, SES Americom, Eutelsat, Loral Skynet, NewSkies, SatMex and others, the SUIRG annual meeting included presentations from signal identification or transmitter geo-location system companies discussing developments in their respective market technologies. Rick Grenwis of USA based Transmitter Locations Systems, and Mark L. Parry of UK based QiniteQ described their respective products that can identify ground- or ship- borne signals and locate an interference source within minutes. However, according to James Budden, SUIRG chairman and VP, Operations of NewSkies Satellite, the challenge for large satellite operators with multiple uplink sites is determining the most cost effective placements of these transmitter location systems. "The real goal is to get these systems out there at a price that's affordable to operators and sustainable by providers," he claimed. While there was some discussion about the benefits of satellite operators collectively supporting a TLS system, such as wider deployment and shared costs, attendees agreed that company firewalls and differing IT systems posed significant hurdles that would need to be surmounted. The group agreed to investigate ways to make such collaboration effective. The real issue, everyone agreed, lies with reducing the number and types of RFI incidents. This requires greater outreach on the part of the satellite operators, intensified efforts by hardware and software suppliers to build affordable transmission with signal ID capability, and most importantly, a good faith effort by satellite uplinkers to provide their technicians with appropriate levels of training as part of an industry-wide recognized satellite operator certification program and to purchase and maintain quality RF transmission equipment. "Radio frequency interference is a major problem for all of us," declared Budden. "It will only get worse as 2 degree spacing fills up and new, inexperienced network operators, driven by costs, increasingly neglect technician training and minimize equipment maintenance. RFI is a quality of service issue that relates directly to the reputation of our industry and the satisfaction of satellite service customers," he added. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Satellite Users Interference Reduction Group SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express The latest information about the Commercial Satellite Industry
Squeezing Ukraine In Space
Moscow (UPI) Dec 18, 2005Despite political differences, Russia and Ukraine used to play on the same "space" field in pre-"Orange Revolution" times. Today the situation is radically altered and the Ukrainian space industry risks stagnating and losing its positions as the space component of the national economy. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
