"Harmony and Disharmony: Exploiting al-Qaida's Organizational Vulnerabilities" -- the title echoes John Boyd -- offers a far more sophisticated approach to terrorism than the "kill or capture" method currently in vogue with the U.S. government.

The bulk of the paper is summaries of translations of some of al-Qaida's own key documents, materials that allow other analysts to see al-Qaida as it sees itself. As the study notes, "Any external assessment of al-Qaida's weaknesses will have inherent limitations. The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point believes an internal assessment -- from actual members of the al-Qaida organization -- is the best method to accurately assess their own true vulnerabilities." That is correct, and providing materials that offer such an internal assessment would alone make this a valuable paper.

But in fact "Harmony and Disharmony" does a great deal more. For the first time in any U.S. Army materials I have seen, it offers an approach to fighting al-Qaida that might actually work.

As the paper's authors state right up front, "Our analysis emphasizes that effective strategies to combat threats posed by al-Qaida will create and exacerbate schisms within its membership." In other words, instead of trying to win a jousting game al-Qaida is too smart to play, we need to follow the old Roman rule, divide et impera, divide and rule.

The question, of course, is how to do this, and most of "Harmony and Disharmony" is devoted to answering this question. It does so in a variety of intelligent and imaginative ways.

Working from the Fourth Generation war framework first laid out in the 1989 Marine Corps Gazette article, it offers an intellectual model for identifying exploitable fissures within al-Qaida and similar Fourth Generation organizations. The paper accepts that al-Qaida is a networked rather than a hierarchical organization, but instead of stopping where most such efforts do, with identifying the strengths of networked organizations, it goes on to probe their inherent weaknesses.

In doing so, "Harmony and Disharmony" notes that "The key insight is that terrorist groups, and other covert organizations, face two fundamental trade-offs. The first is between operational security and financial efficiency... The second trade-off is between operational security and tactical control... Strategies to mitigate these problems through greater control entail security costs for groups as a whole... There are strong theoretical reasons to believe these problems are inescapable for all terrorist groups..."

As to how these inherent tensions in networked, Fourth Generation organizations might be exploited, the paper goes on to say,

"The problems outlined above fall into the larger category of 'agency problems.' Such problems arise when three conditions exist: (1) a principal needs to delegate certain actions or decisions to an agent; (2) the principal can neither perfectly monitor the agent's actions, nor punish with certainty when a transgression is identified; and (3) the agent's preferences are not aligned with those of the principal... Understanding why groups face preference divergence, and when preference divergence creates operational challenges, facilitates government actions intended to exacerbate internal organizational problems of the terrorists."

After looking at how agency problems led the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria to fail, "Harmony and Disharmony" compares Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al-Qaida in Mesopotamia with its Syrian counterpart. It then goes on to an extremely valuable discussion of "Organizational Vulnerabilities and Recommendations to Exploit Them."

Of critical importance, this discussion grasps that "kinetic solutions" are often the worst. For example, at one point the paper recommends that counter-terrorism forces "refrain from actions that encourage preference alignment. Al-Qaida members who appear less committed should not necessarily be removed from the network if they can be reliably observed, even if they present easy targets. By leaving them in place, the probability that the group will identify agency problems and hence adopt security-reducing measures increases."

"Harmony and Disharmony" is too rich in substance for me to attempt to summarize it here. Let me instead just recommend that anyone and everyone who is seriously interested in 4GW get a copy and read it closely. The Combating Terrorism Center says the best way to obtain a copy is from their web site, www.ctc.usma.edu.

William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation. United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
The Long War - Doctrine and Application

Memory Foam Mattress Review

SPACE MEDIA NETWORK PROMOTIONS Solar Energy Solutions Tempur-Pedic Mattress Comparison ... Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News