Energy News  
Northrop Grumman KC-45: Why We Won - Strengths And Weaknesses

File image.
by Staff Writers
Washington DC (SPX) May 20, 2008
The U.S. Air Force found Northrop Grumman's bid to build the next generation of aerial refueling tankers superior to Boeing's in four of the five most important selection criteria.

Despite this fact, the losing bidder wants the Government Accountability Office to overturn the Air Force decision to award the contract to Northrop Grumman even though the Air Force conducted what even Boeing described as a fair, open and transparent bidding process.

Here is another reason Northrop Grumman won, drawn from a list of facts included in a redacted version of a protected Air Force selection document.

Strengths and Weaknesses
Boeing likes to claim that its proposed aircraft was rated better than Northrop Grumman's winning KC-45 tanker, stating that it was rated superior to Northrop Grumman on 98 items - called "discriminators" - while Northrop Grumman was superior on 30.

But discriminators are not just "added up" - they vary greatly in significance. Instead of focusing on the most important discriminators, Boeing is counting items that the Air Force judged were much less critical to the KC-X's core mobility mission.

In all, the Air Force identified approximately 800 requirements of varying importance. And the Air Force Request For Proposal (RFP) made clear that it considered Aerial Refueling and Airlift to be the two most important performance criteria.

In these critical categories - which go to the heart of the KC-X mission - Northrop Grumman was clearly superior to Boeing, attaining a two-to-one advantage in key discriminators.

Where were Boeing's advantages? They were in less critical areas like having more interior electrical outlets, better flight deck seats, and the ability to carry secondary, rarely-used fuels - like Swedish Kerosene.

How do more electrical outlets stack up against increased fuel offload over range? How do better flight deck seats compare to greater airlift capability? The conclusion is obvious. The Air Force made clear what its priorities were in the RFP, rated the two competitors, and selected the KC-45.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Possible 4.5 billion dollar fighter sale to Romania: Pentagon
Washington (AFP) May 19, 2008
The Pentagon notified Congress on Monday of the possible sale of 48 F-16 fighters to Romania as part of a deal valued at 4.5 billion dollars.







  • Greenwood Technologies Brings Clean Tech Wood Boilers To Heating Industry
  • Philippines to try and harness sea currents for energy
  • Massachusetts Wind Energy Team Win MIT Clean Energy Entrepreneur Prize
  • Xcel Energy Begins Work On SmartGridCity In Boulder

  • EDF says it will share nuclear experience with US group Exelon
  • China confirms nuclear safety after quake: army
  • EBRD agrees to help fund Chernobyl sarcophagus
  • British Energy says has received several offers for company

  • New clean air rules may endanger parks
  • National Study Examines Health Risks Of Coarse Particle Pollution
  • Beijing working to clear the air
  • Methane Sources Over The Last 30,000 Years

  • Brazil's military should patrol Amazon: new environment minister
  • Myanmar cyclone damage worsened by loss of mangroves: FAO
  • Costa Rica plants more trees to become carbon neutral
  • Two billion trees planted in UN campaign

  • Food and climate fears combine to put focus on global biodiversity
  • Biodiversity loss costs six percent of world income: report
  • U.S. promotes GMO crops in food package
  • Finding The Real Potential Of No-Till Farming For Sequestering Carbon

  • Lithium Technology Powers Hybrid Electric Supercar
  • Professor Studies What Cars Can Learn From Drivers' Words
  • Free-Flowing Traffic With ORINOKO
  • Tesla's electric sports car aiming at Europe market

  • China's new jumbo-jet firm no threat to Airbus, Boeing: state media
  • China unveils new jumbo jet company: report
  • NASA And JAXA To Conduct Joint Research On Sonic Boom Modeling
  • Analysis: Can airplanes go green?

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement