 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
NKorean Financial Sanctions Based On Solid Evidence
Washington (AFP) Jan 09, 2006 The United States said Monday that sanctions imposed on nuclear-armed North Korea for alleged illicit financial activities were based on carefully scrutinized evidence, rejecting Pyongyang's contention that the charges were groundless. "The Treasury Department's very careful in going through, accumulating and analyzing this evidence in coordination with other parts of the US government," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters. A North Korean foreign ministry spokesman claimed on Monday that evidence supplied by the United States to justify financial sanctions on the Stalinist state for alleged counterfeiting and money-laundering activities had turned out to be "baseless" fiction. Pyongyang insists that the sanctions, targeting the flow of hard currency to North Korea, are a major roadblock to six-party talks aimed at ending a three-year standoff with the United States over its nuclear weapons program. McCormack defended the financial sanctions and said there would be no let up in actions against any illicit financial activities by North Korea. "We are going to continue to take those steps. And we believe that any other country would take steps to protect itself, to act to prevent or stop illicit activity," he said. "Whether that's counterfeiting or whether that's money laundering or engaging in drug trafficking or the trafficking in illicit military technologies, the United States is going to take actions to prevent that," he added. The US Treasury Department in September told US financial institutions to stop dealing with a Macau bank, Banco Delta Asia, which it accused of being a front for North Korean counterfeiting. A month later the US blacklisted eight North Korean companies allegedly involved in the spread of weapons of mass destruction. The sanctions are effective because they restrict the flow of hard currency to North Korea's ruling elite, while sparing ordinary people, analysts say. North Korea said Washington must lift the sanctions for the nuclear talks to resume among the United States, the two Koreas, Russia, China and Japan. Pyongyang argued that the sanctions breached the spirit of a September pact secured at the Beijing-hosted talks, in which North Korea agreed in principle to disband its nuclear weapons program in return for economic and diplomatic benefits. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said last week the US sanctions were justified, noting the absence of protests from the international community. "There hasn't been much uproar from anybody else about the fact that we are engaged in trying to constrain these illicit activities," she said. The nuclear standoff between Pyongyang and Washington ignited in 2002 when the United States accused North Korea of running a secret uranium-enrichment program. North Korea responded by throwing out UN International Atomic Energy Agency weapons inspectors and abandoning the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Source: Agence France-Presse Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
World Powers Threaten Defiant Iran Over Nuclear Crisis
Vienna (AFP) Jan 11, 2006World powers threatened Iran with UN Security Council sanctions Wednesday after it resumed sensitive nuclear activities as a defiant Tehran vowed to press ahead with its disputed atomic programme. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
