![]() |
Washington, DC Feb. 10, 1998 -
Washington, DC Feb. 10, 1998 - Data being studied from the lunar orbiting Prospector satellite cannot be quantified as having detected ice on the Moon, the head of the project's science team told SpaceCast Monday in an exclusive interview. Dr. Alan Binder, Principal Investigator for the Lunar Prospector Project, said by telephone from the Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California that the data is of unexpectedly high quality - but that analysis has so far proved to be a non conclusive result. "We're glad people everywhere are interested in this information, but we can make no conclusive statements yet, even on a preliminary basis," Binder said.Reports by sources who claim to either have seen the data themselves, or have other firsthand knowledge of its results and are claiming ice has been detected "are just plain wrong", Binder told SpaceCast. 'I know that there are all these reports and rumors going around, and that people would like to have an answer, but it's just not the way it works," he explained. Binder also said that a decision has been made to hold what he described as a "very preliminary" press conference to discuss the data "in the last week of February at the earliest, and it may go into early March." But Binder reported that he and the head of the Spectrometer Group, Dr. William Feldman, were ecstatic on the data received from the spacecraft's neutron spectrometer thus far. "This data is beyond belief!", Binder said. "It's just incredibly high quality data. I mean, we expected to get good stuff, but nobody expected anything this good." When asked to characterize that, Binder said that the spectrometer data "was showing just amazing sensitivity." He added that when the first spectrometer data was tallied after a single 14-day long pass around the Moon by the Lunar Prospector, "we could actually make out the composition of the surface area - the neutron flux, even after just one pass, allowed us to pick out individual features with confidence." Binder said that the neutron data could yield an "early, preliminary estimate" of surface composition results, but the definitive word on whether there was water ice on the Moon would have to wait for the Gamma Ray spectrometer data, "which could take us six months" to analyze, he added. The analysis that he and Dr. Feldman were conducting was a slow, painstaking task, Dr. Binder said, because "one must correct for all of the effects" that the relatively weak signals return, along with accurate composition determinations. "What we want to avoid is to say something that we will have to come back later and contradict." He stressed that when he steps before the cameras at months end, "that will just be a preliminary assessment of what we've seen." Binder's interview with SpaceCast was among the first on-the-record discussions of the satellite data analysis now underway at NASA since a hail of rumors swept through the space science community last week. The reports, from a variety of sources, claimed that the data strongly indicated the presence of water ice on the Moon's South Pole. "That might turn out to be true," Binder said Monday afternoon. "And again, it might not. We just don't know yet." Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Space
Sydney - Apr 08, 2002It's only a year since the world staged the inaugural Yuri's Night celebrations, but so much has changed on Earth, and in space. In 2001, we contemplated a world that had shed most of the tensions associated with the cold war, and watched as several nations assembled the world's first International Space Station. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |