 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
MIT Probe Rejects BMD Research Fraud Claim
Cambridge MA (UPI) May 24, 2006 An internal MIT review has found university officials largely blameless for a three- to four-year delay in examining allegations of research fraud at Lincoln Laboratory, the Boston Globe reported Saturday. The investigation into the possible fraud in a missile defense study began two months ago, five years after the allegations were raised by Theodore Postol, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Postol has criticized MIT for dragging its feet, but university officials have said they were hamstrung by the U.S. government's refusal to allow them access to the necessary materials. Postol argued that a team that included MIT scientists could not have acted in good faith when they used what he said was flawed data to deem ''basically sound" the results from a 1997 test of an infrared missile sensor, the Globe said. A panel of four MIT professors began looking into the delays in the fall. The committee affirmed MIT's assertions that the U.S. Department of Defense was responsible for most of the delay. After an initial MIT inquiry concluded in 2002 that a more detailed investigation was warranted, the government refused to allow MIT to investigate and classified some of MIT's documents related to the case, the Globe said. MIT and Defense Department officials finally worked out a compromise, announced in March, under which the Pentagon would investigate and share its conclusions with MIT. The panel also found that Postol contributed to delays and complications by failing to offer a clear and detailed explanation of his charges at the outset, adding to his allegations over time. "The absence of a clear, concise and consistent definition of the allegation complicated the conduct of the inquiry," the panel said. They faulted Postol further for revealing confidential information to the media and others. The panel recommended a few small changes to MIT investigative procedures. They identified a few minor factors that slowed the university's initial inquiry, including a period of uncertainty about whether MIT's research misconduct policy applied to the situation, given that the work was done for the government, not for MIT. But the panel did not find that MIT made any significant mistakes, the Globe said. Postol dismissed the panel's findings Friday, the paper reported.
Source: United Press International Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links - Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
US consults Europeans on anti-missile site
Washington (AFP) May 22, 2006 The United States is consulting European allies about deploying missile defenses in Europe to thwart a Middle Eastern ballistic missile threat, a Pentagon spokesman said Monday. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
