Energy News  
Has America And Russia Lost Control Of The High Ground

NASA is becoming more and more skeptical about subsequent U.S. involvement in the ISS program, which is so far the only Russian-U.S. manned space mission. On November 17, Michael L. Coats, director of NASA's Johnson Space Center, told Space.com that NASA had to complete the ISS orbiter, if at all possible. Still it seems that NASA bureaucrats want to shelve this problem. Consequently, any breakthrough in our ooperation seems impossible today.

Moscow (UPI) Nov 19, 2005
Anatoly Perminov, head of Russia's Federal Space Agency (Roskosmos), and NASA Administrator Michael Griffin will meet in January 2006 to formalize the joint operation of the International Space Station (ISS), which is the only international manned space program today.

Common sense has prevailed over political ambitions this time, with the U.S. Congress amending the Iran Nonproliferation Act that expressly forbade NASA to pay Roskosmos in line with the ISS program. Now it seems that Moscow and Washington are reinstating long-forgotten aspects of their cooperation.

The administration of President George W. Bush advocates an entirely different cooperation concept to that of Bill Clinton's. One gets the impression that we have now traveled back to the time when John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson were also divided on U.S.-Soviet cooperation aspects.

Kennedy, who had every reason to believe that the United States could not win the Space Race against the Soviet Union, planned to build a "space bridge" between the two countries. He approached Moscow through the UN to implement a joint Moon mission.

Just like Kennedy, Johnson was very keen on space exploration. But, unlike his predecessor, he never made any official cooperation proposals to the Kremlin. When presenting NASA Medals of Distinction to the Apollo-8 crew, Johnson stated openly that America must become the world leader in this area at any cost. He therefore regarded space exploration in the context of rivalry, rather than partnership.

Moscow and Washington were unable to cooperate in this sphere because of the escalating Vietnam War. The United States bombed North Vietnam in support of Saigon, while the Soviet Union openly helped Hanoi, which at that time was the root of the Cold War.

Open confrontation is now history. Unfortunately, the Bush administration and NASA bosses do not openly support the ISS program, which had been proposed by President Bill Clinton. They prefer to make vague statements instead. Just like 40 years ago, the United States is now planning a lunar mission in line with the Constellation program.

This program emphasizes America's leading role in organizing long-term inter-planetary expeditions independently, without the involvement of any other country. And U.S. leaders are merely paying lip service to possible cooperation with Russia in this sphere.

NASA is becoming more and more skeptical about subsequent U.S. involvement in the ISS program, which is so far the only Russian-U.S. manned space mission. On November 17, Michael L. Coats, director of NASA's Johnson Space Center, told Space.com that NASA had to complete the ISS orbiter, if at all possible. Still it seems that NASA bureaucrats want to shelve this problem.

Consequently, any breakthrough in our cooperation seems impossible today.

(Andrei Kislyakov is a political correspondent for the RIA Novosti news agency This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
Space Station News at Space-Travel.Com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


NASA Had No Choice But To Buy Soyuz Flights
Washington DC (SPX) Jan 09, 2006
NASA's announcement last week that it will pay Roskosmos $43.6 million for a round-trip ride to the International Space Station this spring, and an equivalent figure for an as-yet-undetermined number of future flights to the station until 2012, represents the agency's acknowledgment that it had no alternative.







  • Analysis: Putin As Energy Czar
  • China, Japan Vie For African Oil
  • Biorenewables - Products For A Sustainable Future: York Leads The Way
  • Workshop to Help Gauge Nation's Energy and Water Concerns

  • Romanian Nuclear Power Station Shut Down After 'Minor Fault'
  • Experts Blast Bush On India Nuke Deal
  • Duke Power May Build Nuclear Power Plants
  • Innovative 'Recycling' Project Could Reduce US Inventory Of Spent Nuclear Fuel

  • Getting To The TOPP Of Houston's Air Pollution
  • Scientists Seek Sprite Light Source



  • India To Protect Its Farmers
  • Conservationists Appalled By Thailand's Buffet Of Exotic Wildlife
  • Tomatosphere: Tomato Seeds In Students' Hands, After 18 Months In Space
  • Australia Seeks More Palatable Name For Kangaroo Steaks

  • GM Hires Russian Nuclear Scientists To Develop New Auto Technology
  • Japan Creates The World's Fastest Electric Sedan
  • Motorists To Pay 'Congestion' Charge Over Broader Swath Of London
  • Solar Cars Driving Towards A Hydrogen Future

  • Airbus V. Boeing: War Over The World's Sky
  • DoD Orders Another $3 Billion Lot Of F/A-22 Raptors
  • L-3 Comms Display Systems Awarded Contract For F-35 Cockpit Display
  • Lockheed Martin Adds Networked Combat Air Simulation To The Center For Innovation

  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program
  • Boeing-Led Team to Study Nuclear-Powered Space Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement