 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Goldilocks and ET
Sydney - March 19, 2001 So far, searches for ET have come up empty-handed. No signals have been detected. But an Australian astronomer Dr Charles Lineweaver has come up with a new way to tell us something about extra-terrestrials. By cleverly combining observations of extra-solar planets and the rate of star formation in the Universe, he has found that our Earth is much younger than other Earth-like planets in the Universe. In a paper recently submitted to Icarus, the leading journal of planetary science, Dr Lineweaver reported that "three quarters of the Earth-like planets in the Universe are older than the Earth and their average age is 1.8 (plus or minus 0.9) billion years older than the Earth". Dr Lineweaver outlined his argument as follows: "Immediately after the Big Bang, 13 billion years ago, the Universe was made of hydrogen and helium. There was no carbon, oxygen, iron or silicon. Therefore no Earth-like planets could form around the first stars. "Then, in a strong burst of star formation that lasted a few billion years, these ingredients were produced in abundance by stars. This meant the formation of Earth-like planets became possible. "But there is a catch. Too much of these ingredients seems to be a bad thing for Earth formation. The 50 or so huge extra-solar planets detected so far are found preferentially around stars rich in these ingredients. And these huge planets are in orbits that would destroy any Earth-like planets. "You can think of this as a 'Goldilocks effect': with a shortage of ingredients Earths were unable to form, with too much, giant planets would destroy any Earths trying to form. As Goldilocks insisted, the porridge had to be 'just right' or there was no deal." Although his analysis is about terrestrial planets, not life on them, Dr Lineweaver concluded that if life formed as readily on other Earth-like planets as it did on Earth some 3.5 billion years ago -- then this gives us an age distribution for life on such planets and a rare clue about how we compare with other life that might inhabit the Universe. "The 'rare clue' is this: most of the life forms in the Universe have had two billion years longer to evolve than we have. To put this time span in perspective, two billion years ago our ancestors were microscopic single-celled amoebas," he said. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links An Estimate of the Age Distribution of Terrestrial Planets SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express Space
Satellite Launch To Boost DTH In India
Calcutta, India (SPX) Dec 28, 2005The successful launch Thursday of India's heaviest satellite from spaceport of Kourou in French Guyana may have boosted the country's space research efforts to yet another level, but it has also lifted the spirits of at least three Direct-To-Home televisions broadcasters, one of which has been waiting for years to launch its services in India. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
