Energy News  
Faster ozone-depleting chemicals ban hits funding speed bump

by Staff Writers
Montreal (AFP) Sept 19, 2007
UN talks to hasten a ban on ozone-depleting chemicals were mired in the nitty-gritty Wednesday, as countries tried to fix the economic costs of meeting a new timetable and funding, a UN Environment Program spokesman said.

"The central aspect of the negotiations now is the envelope on the amount of money that is needed to accelerate the freezing (and) phase-out of HCFCs (Hydrochlorofluorocarbons)," UNEP spokesman Nick Nuttall told AFP.

"I would not characterize it as a major obstacle or hurdle but there is still debate about whether the money is actually on the table from the developed countries for the developing countries," he said.

An estimated 150 million dollars per year is needed to replenish an existing fund beyond 2008 to help countries switch to new technologies and chemicals that do not deplete the ozone, said delegates.

Others want assurances an amendment to the 1987 Montreal Protocol would not devastate industries facing unique circumstances, Nuttall said.

South Africa, for example, relies heavily on HCFCs to cool its gold mines and refuses to interrupt mining while waiting for new specialized air conditioning technologies to be rolled out.

"They need to know that this is not going to be interrupted by an agreement here," Nuttall said.

"The discussions are about financial aspects and reassurances that if you do get an accelerated freeze and phase-out, certain countries' economic or industrial positions (are taken into account)," he said.

The current calendar calls for developed countries to stop using anti-ozone compounds found in many refrigerators, fire retardants and hairspray by 2030, and for developing nations to follow suit by 2040.

But the United States and the European Union, backed by UNEP, want to see 10 years trimmed off that timetable after discovering that patching up the ozone layer will also help tackle global warming.

Delegates of 190 countries, including more than 70 environment ministers, are meeting in Montreal this week to mark the 20th anniversary of the first treaty to protect Earth's stratospheric shield and to hammer out a new agenda.

Despite the sluggish pace of negotiations, Nuttall commented, "We're optimistic that we will get a deal on Friday."

"It's a golden opportunity and a golden opportunity that does not come around very often. If it's not taken by countries this week, we may lose that golden opportunity forever," he said.

The Montreal Protocol, adopted in September 1987, was designed to heal the gaping hole in the blanket of oxygen molecules that protects animal and plant life from the Sun's dangerous ultraviolet rays.

The atmospheric wound, which last year was estimated to span a record 29.5 million square kilometers (10.81 million square miles) over and beyond the Antarctic, is believed to be caused by slowly degrading pollutants in the air.

Ninety-five percent of targets for older CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) elimination by 2010 have already been met.

But some 88,000 tons of ozone-depleting substances are still produced every year, 85 percent of them in the industrialized world. And experts estimate that an additional 10,000 to 15,000 tons are produced illegally.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
All about the Ozone Layer



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Outside View: Ozone hits defense industry
Moscow (UPI) Sep 18, 2007
Having signed the Montreal Protocol 20 years ago, on Sept. 16, 1987, the world agreed to renounce the industrial use of substances depleting the ozone layer.







  • EU New Policy Plan Targets Energy Giants
  • Analysis: Venezuela, Russia team up on oil
  • From plate to engine: French city powers buses with food scraps
  • Government Initiatives Drive Latin American Renewable Energy Markets

  • Indian stalemate continues on US nuclear deal
  • Lives, energy supply at risk from 'denials of shipment': IAEA
  • CAR criticizes Areva uranium mine deal
  • UN nuclear chief faces new US criticism

  • Volcanoes Key To Earth's Oxygen Atmosphere
  • Invisible Gases Form Most Organic Haze In Both Urban And Rural Areas
  • BAE Systems Completes Major New Facility For Ionospheric Physics Research
  • NASA Satellite Captures First View Of Night-Shining Clouds

  • Refugia Of The Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest Could Be The Basis For Its Regeneration
  • Indonesia proposes rainforest nations climate group
  • ASEAN urged to muster political will to deal with forest fire haze
  • Humans Fostering Forest-Destroying Disease

  • Yam Bean A Nearly Forgotten Crop
  • Grazing Land Management For Better Beef And Reef
  • HARDY Rice: Less Water, More Food
  • UD Leads 5 Million Dollar Research Project On Rice Epigenetics

  • Judge rejects California bid to sue carmakers over warming
  • China to hold first-ever 'no car day' on Saturday
  • Judge hits auto makers, allows Vermont to limit emissions
  • EU automakers reject 2012 deadline for CO2 cuts

  • Cathay Pacific chief hits out at anti-aviation critics
  • Squabble over airline carbon emissions takes flight
  • Boeing Projects 340 Billion Dollar Market For New Airplanes In China
  • KC-30 Tanker's General Electric Power Plant Completes One Million Takeoff And Landing Cycles

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space
  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement