 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Europeans Want Missile Defense Too
Washington (UPI) Sep 13, 2005 Many of Europe's governments may be skeptical about America's ambitious ballistic missile defense development program but their publics are not. A new study sponsored by advocates of BMD found that more than two-thirds of Europeans want NATO to deploy such systems to protect them. Some 71 percent of Europeans favor the deployment of a NATO missile defense capability able to protect the continent from attack by missiles bearing weapons of mass destruction, according to a poll that was jointly sponsored by the George C. Marshall Center for Security Studies and Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, the two organizations announced in Rome last week. By contrast, only 16 percent think that NATO should not have this capability. "It is clear from the survey that the threat is real, urgent and needs to be addressed. In addition, there is a strong belief that NATO nations need to be at the forefront in finding a ballistic missile defense system capable of providing security for the nations in the region," said John Rose, Director of the Marshall Center in Garmisch, Germany. The poll was conducted by the polling firm of Novatris/Harris with a margin error rate of +/- 2.9 percent in France, Germany, Britain, Spain, Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands and Denmark. According to the poll, 56 percent of Europeans would support a deployment of BMD systems in their own countries. Further, 73 percent said it was a good idea for NATO to deploy BMD systems to protect troops in the field as well as citizens at home. Just over a quarter of those polled, 26 percent said the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was the most significant threat facing Europe. However, twice as many, 52 percent, believed violent acts by terrorists groups pose the greatest threat. Only 3 percent saw China's growing military power as a threat. Europeans were also laid about potential ballistic missile threats from the two remaining nations in what President George W. Bush in January 2002 described as the "Axis of Evil" - Iran and North Korea. Only 5 percent said they were concerned with Iran's nuclear ascendancy and even fewer, 3 percent said they were concerned about North. There were clear majorities in favor of deploying missile defense systems in France (69 percent, Germany (68 percent), Britain (72 percent), Spain (54 percent), Italy (60 percent), Poland (84 percent), the Czech Republic (62 percent), the Netherlands (63 percent). Denmark polled lowest in this area with only 44 percent of those asked supporting the idea. "The poll results strongly demonstrate that Europeans are concerned about the threat posed by ballistic missiles potentially armed with weapons of mass destruction," said Riki Ellison, President of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, a not-for-profit organization that advocates missile defense. "They are determined to protect their way of life by fielding a purely defensive capability." Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Missile Defense Program Moves Forward
Washington DC (AFPS) Jan 12, 2006The Missile Defense Agency continues to move forward in its efforts to protect the nation against a ballistic missile attack. The eighth ground-based interceptor missile was lowered into its underground silo at Fort Greely, Alaska, Dec. 18, 2005. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
