 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Britain Launches Nuclear Missile Debate
London (AFP) Mar 15, 2006 Britain opened an inquiry into replacing its ageing nuclear weaponry on Tuesday with some participants warning it could be too expensive "staying in the business", others branding it pointless. Britain is likely to decide before 2010 whether to replace its Trident submarine-launched nuclear-tipped ballistic missile system, which comes up for renewal in around 15 years. The hearing gave proponents on both sides of the argument the chance to set out their case as part of the decision process. Sir Michael Quinlan, a former top Ministry of Defence official, told the Commons Defence Committee into the British nuclear deterrent that it was unclear how much a replacement system would cost. "How much risk we are prepared to accept," he asked, against an unspecified future threat. "My own view is that there will be some cost that will be simply too much to pay for the insurance of staying in this business." He favoured scaling back Britain's deterrent, but said it would be a wrench to give nuclear weapons up -- particularly while France kept theirs. "I think it is just national gut feeling," he said. "To leave the French as the only people with (a nuclear deterrent, out of Britain and France), I think, would twitch a lot of very fundamental historical nerves. "I am not arguing about the logic of it. I just think there will be that gut feeling that we can't." Lee Willett, of the Royal United Services Institute military think-tank, warned against giving up Britain's nuclear weapons as other countries acquire them. He said: "We do not know what the future will hold. While others have nuclear weapons, the only thing that will deter a nuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon." Rebecca Johnson, of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy, dismissed the concept of nuclear deterrence. "If you believe in it, then it gives you a bit of reassurance until it gets tested and it fails, at which point it is far too late to discover that it wasn't actually helping you at all," she said. Britain has four Trident submarines in service. They each have 16 multiple warhead nuclear missiles with a range of 12,000 kilometres (7,500 miles). If ministers do decide to replace Trident, they would have to choose whether to stick with a purely submarine-based deterrent or utilise land- or air-based systems.
Source: Agence France-Presse Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links - Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
UN Must Be Robust And Determined Over Iran
London (AFP) Mar 15, 2006The United Nations Security Council needs to stand firm to bring about a swift end the stand-off with Iran over its nuclear programme, Britain's Foreign Secretary said Tuesday. "The more robust and determined the resolve, the quicker that this can be resolved satisfactorily, above all for the Iranian people," Jack Straw told lawmakers in the lower House of Commons. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
