Energy News  
Bottom Line Shot Commodities

Today, too much ease and inflation; tomorrow, an overdue but possibly overdone tightening, and investor confusion; the day after tomorrow, recession.
by Gregory Fossedal
UPI Columnist
Washington (UPI) Jun 01, 2006
Gold, copper, sugar, silver, and oil -- to name just a few -- have corrected nearly 10 percent each from recent generational highs. It could be this is just a pause before they soar further into orbit. It could also be the beginning of a long re-assertion of economic gravity.

A year ago, Bottom Line spoke to noted investor and author Jimmy Rogers of "Hot Commodities" fame -- whose message was an undifferentiated "buy." Buy commodities across the board; don't sell commodities; and, in short, be long.

Rogers was not only right; but had some proper internal picks, favoring sugar, coffee, and copper, all of which have outperformed even the rest of the group.

Today, precisely given the magnitude of those increases, the question is, are there now "shot commodities" that are ripe for the shorting? And which ones?

A market of (commodity) stocks

It's often said of equities, "it's a market of stocks -- not a stock market," or in the words of cautious forecasters, "this is a stock-pickers' market." (God bless the folks at CNBC for heaping appropriate scorn on that clich� in recent years.)

Well: sauce for the gander, it seems to me, for commodities. If in doubt, sell. But there's still time to buy in on energy and perhaps, some energy-related farm goods such as corn and sugar.

There's always the potential for a final gasp of strength in copper, aluminum, and gold -- just as the Nasdaq in 2000, or U.S. housing prices in early 2005, enjoyed the view from on high before leaping back to reality. As those analogies suggest, however, there's more downside potential than upside.

Copper top

The strongest reason to be out of the metals is the global economy, which probably peaked in the first quarter, or is peaking now -- and will be flat, or mildly down, in the second half of 2006 and early 2007. Yet there are particular reasons, too.

The U.S. housing market has now, as we warned last July, entered a multi-year decline. Not only will this indirectly slow commodities down, as over-leveraged consumers have to curtail spending, and banks, lending. It will also have a direct impact on, for example, copper -- of which the housing industry is a major buyer.

In many other countries -- Australia, Britain, Germany -- real estate turned down years ago. In others -- even India and China -- an actual downturn isn't likely, but the peak rate of growth has passed.

Over on the supply side, inventories of many commodities has thinned, due to strikes (Mexico, Nigeria), nationalizations (Venezuela, Bolivia), and downright riots (China).

For the metals, however, much of this is past news. The mining strikes are winding down. Drastic policy changes, to the extent they've happened, have, well happened. As unfair as (for example) the takings by Venezuela and Bolivia are, they do not destroy or necessarily interrupt any supply. In the long-run, they're a disincentive for companies to invest in new production in those countries, but in the near term, the de facto theft has worked.

By contrast, the Middle East remains a cauldron of resentments and potential disruptions. Of the major energy suppliers to the United States, America has launched a trade war with one (Canada), attacked another (Iraq), threatened two more (Iran and Venezuela). We're on good terms with Saudi Arabia, but how long can the princes last, especially against a background of nuclear brinksmanship in the region? Natural disasters in the Gulf, and bad policy in Washington, threaten what little secure supply is left in the world.

Looming somewhere in the background is Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, facing the awful tradeoff of appearing to tough, and shutting down economic growth, or appearing too soft, and fueling an inflation scare. (The latter would probably be followed -- e.g. is likely to be in the coming months -- by at least a mild, "growth" recession. If not worse.)

The Bottom Line

Stuck in the middle with nowhere to go, Bernanke has sought a third route -- indicating he's uncertain what to do until more data come in, and then, complaining about the market's confusion over what data he's looking for and how he'll act on them. Commodity prices? Real GDP? The yield curve?

It's a mystery, which is why there's still room for a further run in the energy sector this summer and fall. But the smart money will be looking to short positions on copper and the mining stocks, while stocking up for one last run in oil to $100 a barrel.

Today, too much ease and inflation; tomorrow, an overdue but possibly overdone tightening, and investor confusion; the day after tomorrow, recession. Consult your economic history books under 1971-74, 1979-1982, and 1990-92. We're well into that cycle, hence: buy energy, short the metals, sell equities, and start nibbling at debt.

Gregory Fossedal Gregory Fossedal, [email protected], is an advisor to international investors on global markets and ideopolitical risk

Source: United Press International

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
- The Economy



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


China growth unsustainable on all counts
Beijing (AFP) May 30, 2006
China's growth model, based on the West's economic model with its massive appetite for resources and increasing environmental degradation is unsustainable and will have to change, a leading environmentalist said Tuesday.







  • Oil prices retreat as US offers talks with Iran
  • Crude oil prices rise amid Iran concerns
  • For The Future Hydrogen Economy, A Tiny, Self-Powered Sensor
  • GE to invest 50 mln dlrs in environment-related R and D in China

  • Ex-French nuclear chief charged over Chernobyl cover-up
  • Iran Calls For Tenders On Two New Reactors
  • India admits more work to be done on nuclear deal with US
  • Radioactive Tritium Pollutes Groundwater

  • Faster Atmospheric Warming In Subtropics Pushes Jet Streams Toward Poles
  • Atmospheric Warming Expanding The Tropics
  • In The Baltics Spring And Smoke Is In The Air
  • UNH And NASA Unlock The Puzzle Of Global Air Quality

  • Tropical Forests Reveal Improvements in Sustainable Management
  • Indonesia promises this year will be less hazy
  • Vicious Cycle Of Rainforest Destruction
  • Smithsonian Helps To Plan For Panama's Coiba National Park

  • Duck-And-Goose Lock-Up
  • Super-Sized Cassava Plants May Help Fight Hunger In Africa
  • Search for sushi draining Mediterranean's red tuna stocks
  • New Attempt To Monitor fisheries

  • Activists Press Ford On Environmental Policies
  • Prototype For Revolutionary One-Metre Wide Vehicle Is Developed
  • Highly Realistic Driving Simulator Helps Develop Safer Cars
  • Research On The Road To Intelligent Cars

  • Bush, Blair resolve dispute over Joint Strike Fighter
  • British Aerospace Production Up Strongly In First Quarter
  • Face Of Outdoor Advertising Changes With New Airship Design
  • NASA Denies Talks With Japan On Supersonic Jet

  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear
  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement