Energy News  
BBC Insists Katrina Coverage Impartial After Blair 'Attack'

The alleged remarks come at a time when Blair's Labour government and the BBC are already struggling to rebuild a relationship deeply damaged following a row over Iraq.

London (AFP) Sep 18, 2005
The BBC strongly defended itself Sunday against accusations of anti-US bias after British Prime Minister Tony Blair reportedly complained to media tycoon Rupert Murdoch about the public broadcaster's coverage of Hurricane Katrina.

The BBC told AFP that it had received no complaint from Blair's office and said that its coverage of last month's natural disaster "was committed solely to relaying the event fully, accurately and impartially". Downing Street meanwhile refused to comment.

One major British newspaper and a former leading BBC journalist hit out also at the criticism which Murdoch, chairman of the media conglomerate News Corporation, attributed to Blair.

Murdoch told a seminar hosted by former US president Bill Clinton Friday in New York that Blair had described the BBC World Service radio's hurricane coverage as "full of hate" towards the United States.

"Tony Blair - perhaps I shouldn't repeat this conversation - told me yesterday that he was in Delhi last week, and he turned on the BBC World Service to see what was happening in New Orleans," Murdoch said.

"And he said it was just full of hate of America and gloating about our troubles. And that was his government, well his government-owned thing," Murdoch said of the BBC, in a transcript posted on the Clinton Global Initiative website.

The alleged remarks come at a time when Blair's Labour government and the BBC are already struggling to rebuild a relationship deeply damaged following a row over Iraq.

The Independent on Sunday newspaper meanwhile called the charges over Katrina "simply wrong". It said the BBC had been joined by US media in implying criticism of the Bush administration over its response to the hurricane, which ravaged the southeastern city of New Orleans on August 29.

"The simple reason for this was that the facts on the ground were damning of the president (George W. Bush)," the weekly said in an editorial.

A former BBC foreign correspondent and independent MP, Martin Bell, alleged that Blair was trying to curry favour with Murdoch, who controls important British newspapers, as well being chairman of the BBC's private rival BSkyB.

"Tony Blair was telling Murdoch what he wanted to hear because he needs Murdoch's support," Bell was quoted as saying by British media.

"I think Matt Frei's reporting was absolutely immaculate and reflected the fact that one of the things the BBC is there for is to report events as they happened rather than as politicians may want them perceived to have happened.

"If Tony Blair does want to confront the BBC over this, I'd be surprised - because he would find absolutely zero support, except perhaps among his usual henchmen," Bell added.

After revealing Blair's remarks, Murdoch went on to say that anti-American bias was prevalent throughout Europe. Meanwhile Clinton said that while the BBC's reports on the hurricane were factually accurate, its presentation was "stacked up" to criticise Bush's handling of the disaster.

A row between the BBC and Labour in 2003 led to a government weapons expert, David Kelly, killing himself the same year. Kelly had been revealed as the source for a BBC report saying that intelligence on the Iraqi threat was exaggerated to secure public support for the US-led war.

The BBC's director-general, Greg Dyke, and chairman, Gavyn Davies, were forced to resign following an official inquiry that found the BBC at fault.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
Cyberwar - Internet Security News - Systems and Policy Issues



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


US Military Mounts International Psyops Campaign
Washington (AFP) Dec 14, 2005
The US military is mounting a 300 million dollar psychological operations campaign to sway international opinion of the US war on terrorism through messages placed in foreign media, officials said Wednesday.







  • ORNL, Princeton Partners In Five-Year Fusion Project
  • Oil Prices Drop After OPEC Lowers Demand For Crude
  • Helping Out A High-Temperature Superconductor
  • Making Plant Cells Work Like Miniature Factories

  • Scorpene Deal Will Ensure Nuke Supply
  • Russia To Build Nuke Waste Facility
  • Death, Environmental Toll From Chernobyl Less Than Feared: Report
  • China Won't Sign On To PSI

  • Getting To The TOPP Of Houston's Air Pollution
  • Scientists Seek Sprite Light Source



  • Analysis: N.Korea No Longer Wants Food Aid?
  • Novel Compounds Show Promise As Safer, More Potent Insecticides
  • Agriculture Reviving In Aceh After Tsunami: Scientists
  • Analysis: EU Farm Aid Under Spotlight

  • German Car Makers Scramble To Jump On Hybrid Engine Bandwagon
  • Could Katrina Kill The SUV?
  • SUV Drivers Beware: Paris Can Be A Deflating Experience
  • Mitsubishi, TEPCO To Team Up On Electric Car: Report

  • Global Tanker Team To Deliver Boeing Advanced Aerial-Refueling Tanker
  • Sizing Up The Future Of Air Travel
  • Lockheed Martin Produces World's Only 5th Generation Fighters
  • Airport Set To Reopen In Small Step Towards Recovery

  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program
  • Boeing-Led Team to Study Nuclear-Powered Space Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement