Energy News  





. Walker's World: Oil price trade threat

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Martin Walker
Paris (UPI) Jun 25, 2008
The perilous plunges in some of the Asian stock markets, with Shanghai down 44 percent this year and Vietnam down over 60 percent from its highs, should have put the final nail in the coffin of the once fashionable theory of de-coupling, that Asian somehow would been immune from the global slowdown.

Asia's troubles are about to get a great deal worse, because Asia is becoming a victim of the rise in energy prices in an even more spectacular way than higher gasoline prices.

Consider, for example, why it is that China's steel exports to the United States are dropping at a rate of 20 percent this year. The answer is simple: shipping costs. China has to import the iron ore by sea from Brazil or Australia, make the stuff, and then ship it across the Pacific to the West Coast.

The shipping costs, which are adding a minimum $90 a ton to the final price, are making Chinese steel uncompetitive and pricing home-made U.S. steel back into the market. An intriguing new study by Jeff Rubin and Benjamin Tal of Canada's CIBC group puts this into the useful context of comparing the new transport costs with traditional tariffs against imports.

"Even back at a $100 per barrel oil price, transport costs outweigh the impact of tariffs for all of America's trading partners, including even its neighbors, Canada and Mexico," they note. "Back in 2000, when oil prices were $20 per barrel, transport costs were the equivalent of a 3 percent U.S. tariff rate. Currently, transport costs are equivalent to an average tariff rate of more than 9 percent. At $150 per barrel, the tariff-equivalent rate is 11 percent, going back to the average tariff rates of the 1970s."

Their calculations suggest that over the last three years, every extra dollar on the oil price has translated into a 1 percent rise in transport costs. To put it another way, every 10 percent extra mileage means a 4.5 percent increase in transport costs.

On a typical four-week sea voyage from China to North America, and including inland transport, it now costs around $8,000 to send a standard 40 foot container from Shanghai to the U.S. eastern seaboard. In 2000, it cost only $3,000 to ship the same container. If oil goes to $200 per barrel, it would cost $15,000 to send that container from China to New York.

This is good news not just for North American steelmakers but for all the other manufacturing industries that have been undercut by the low China price in recent years. It is very good news for Mexico, whose maquiladora factories along the border can start to compete again. It is good news for U.S. carmakers who may now expect a breathing space from the feared influx of cheap and fuel-efficient Chinese cars.

But it could be grim news for those American firms that shifted much of their manufacturing base over to China over the past decade, who now must scramble to see if that capacity can be quickly restored back at home. So many jobs and factories and skills have gone from America's industrial heartland over the past decade that this will be a real challenge.

The presidential candidates have latched onto this issue. Republican Sen. John McCain is proposing cuts in corporate tax rates and sweeping tax relief on investment in manufacturing plants. Democrat Sen. Barack Obama is proposing a "competitiveness agenda" based on investment in infrastructure and innovation and what he vaguely calls "fair" trade.

The United States still has the world's largest manufacturing economy, and, contrary to conventional wisdom, it has been growing steadily for the past decade, and so has productivity. According to figures from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, from 2001 to 2006 the dollar value of U.S. manufacturing output grew from $1.8 trillion to $2.4 trillion in durable goods and from $2.1 trillion to $2.5 trillion in non-durables.

Some of this is military-related. The value output of military vehicles and parts grew 238 percent from 200 to 2006, and ammunition grew 161 percent. But computer parts, irradiation and laboratory and electro-medical apparatus all grew more. What collapsed was textiles (falling 40 percent) and footwear (down 38 percent) and electric housewares and power tools (down close to 60 percent).

The problem is that while U.S. manufacturing has grown, and usually has done so in high-tech sectors, it has not been growing nearly as much as in China. And China now has the advantage of so many new manufacturing plants with the latest equipment (and has benefited from so much technological transfer) that the United States and Europe have a lot of catching up to do.

The opportunity is there. A real surge is about to come in the manufacture and sale and management of clean energy. Windmills and solar panels, "smart" meters for households and for grid management, nuclear power engineering, plug-in cars and advanced battery systems are all set to boom.

If American industry can take advantage of this opportunity that has been opened by the high oil prices and the sky-high transport costs they have brought, then those distressed mortgages in Ohio and Michigan and the banks that are stuck with them are going to look like good investments again.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com




Tempur-Pedic Mattress Comparison

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News
Top US court slashes Exxon Valdez oil damages
Washington (AFP) June 25, 2008
The US Supreme Court Wednesday rejected as excessive 2.5 billion dollars in punitive damages awarded to victims of the Exxon Valdez oil disaster and said it should be cut to 507 million dollars.

.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
  



  • Indonesia plans to raise gas prices to China, Malaysia, SKorea
  • Walker's World: Oil price trade threat
  • Analysis: Bolivian gas at crossroads
  • Analysis: Turkey pushes new pipeline

  • Britain to sign nuclear deal with energy-poor Jordan
  • Bulgaria to look at new reactors at partly shut nuclear plant
  • Australia must strengthen India ties: foreign minister
  • RWE, Electrabel file binding offers for stake in Bulgarian nuclear power plant

  • Air Travelers And Astronomers Could Benefit From Atmospheric Turbulence Research
  • NASA And Air Resources Board To Examine California Air Quality
  • Field Project Seeks Clues To Climate Change In Remote Atmospheric Region
  • US And UK Research Centers Launch Major Collaboration On Atmospheric Studies

  • Researchers Explain Nitrogen Paradox In Forests
  • Indonesia's haze plan praised by region
  • Tropical Forest Sustainability Could Be A Climate Change Boon
  • Plan To Conserve Forests May Be Detrimental To Other Ecosystems

  • France, Italy isolated in opposition to EU tuna fishing ban
  • EU declares war on illegal fishing with tougher sanctions
  • Fish Don't Fart - Invention Offers Easy Solution To Food Shortages
  • EU confirms closure of industrial tuna fishing season

  • Soaring steel costs to drive up car prices: Nissan CEO
  • At Toyota greenhouse, C02 emissions no villain
  • Green car bonus to push French budget into red: report
  • Montreal Develops A Unique And Innovative Public Bike System

  • China to roll out new turboprop plane: report
  • IATA head slams EU plans to include aviation in emissions trading
  • A Plane With Wings Of Glass
  • US Airways signs code-sharing deal with Air China

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement