Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Energy News .

Panama, Suez, Nicaragua canal schemes miss trade boat: analysts
by Staff Writers
London (AFP) Sept 07, 2014

Vast projects to expand the Suez and Panama canals are being talked up as the biggest upheaval for decades in global maritime traffic, but experts say they could be outflanked by a trade shift towards Asia.

In recent years, freight traffic travelling from Asia to the east coast of the United States has increasingly circumvented the Panama Canal and its restrictions on ship size in favour of the Suez route open to most big vessels.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has launched plans for a second Suez canal in parallel to the existing one at a cost of $4.0 billion (3.0 billion euros).

To attract business back, the board of the Panama Canal began work in 2007 to widen the channel to permit the passage of ships carrying a much greater volume of containers.

The broader channel would allow for vessels carrying 12,000 TEU containers (TEU, or "twenty-foot equivalent unit", is the standard unit of measurement for containers) -- a big increase from the current capacity of 5,000 TEU.

Work on widening the Panama Canal continues despite a dispute on cost overruns.

Meanwhile, Chinese interests are involved in a project still on the drawing board to link the Pacific and Atlantic oceans with a second canal through Nicaragua.

But while the channel through central America should attract an increase in business, "it will not be revolutionary" in terms of global traffic, said James Frew, an analyst with Maritime Strategies International.

He also highlighted the efficient overland distribution network from California to the US east coast, which gives shippers an alternative route.

- Panama project to have 'some impact' -

The enlargement of the Panama Canal "should have some impact on container trades", explained Ralph Leszczynski, head of research at the Banchero Costa brokerage.

"However, for most shipping business such as dry bulk and tankers it's not really such a big deal," he said.

There are 4,500 container ships in the world compared to at least 10,000 dry cargo ships and more than 7,000 tankers.

"These days, most imports of coal, iron ore and oil are dominated by China, India, Japan and they do not require using any of the canals, as the main sources are Australia, Indonesia, Africa and the Middle East," said Leszczynski.

In addition, "the high cost of passing through the Panama Canal is such that it will become less and less attractive for transporting commodities whose prices have fallen -- like iron ore," said Marc Pauchet, head of research on dry bulk carriers at the broker Braemar ACM.

- Changing demands -

The Suez Canal remains "fundamental for all Middle East Gulf to Europe crude oil trades... but even there it's losing importance, as the main sources of growth in oil demand are China and India, and their imports do not cross any canal," said Leszczynski.

Sisi has said the canal through Egypt must be doubled with the second route to increase traffic flow within a year.

But "I see less economic requirement for an expansion of the Suez Canal than I do for the Panama Canal," Frew said.

The only real restriction, he said, "is that you cannot get a fully loaded VLCC (very large crude carriers) through the Suez Canal but there's no restriction on container ships at the moment."

These tankers must currently unload part of their cargo at the beginning of the channel and reload at the end, in order to maintain the correct waterline to pass through.

Leszczynski believes that there is also no economic justification for the construction of a competitor to the Panama Canal in Nicaragua.

"If, magically, it turned out to be cheaper to use than the Panama one then I'm sure shipowners would appreciate it, but again I'm afraid this will not be the case," he said.

"It is interesting to note that it is the Chinese who are responsible for building the canal in Nicaragua," adds Pauchet.

"Perhaps they do not want to submit to American hegemony for passing from the Pacific to the Atlantic."

The United States led the construction of the Panama Canal, and granted themselves the lion's share of concessions from its opening in 1914 until its surrender in 1999.

An agreement still in force today allows them to intervene if they believe the neutrality of the channel is threatened.


Related Links
Global Trade News

Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

China's Alibaba eyes record-breaking IPO
New York (AFP) Sept 05, 2014
Chinese online marketplace Alibaba unveiled plans Friday to raise up to $24.3 billion in what could be the biggest stock flotation in history. The company told US regulators it would offer some 320 million shares in a range of $60 to $66 per share. An option will be available for 48 million additional shares. The plan would raise a minimum of $19.2 billion even if the option for addition ... read more

IRENA: Outdated thinking curbing green energy momentum

Zimbabwe launches $500-mln power units to ease energy woes

Existing power plants will spew 300 billion more tons of carbon dioxide during use

Yale Journal Explores Advances In Sustainable Manufacturing

Clean coal key to combating climate change: Rio Tinto

Tesla picks Nevada for $5 bln battery plant

Changing temperature powers sensors in hard-to-reach places

Ultrasensitive Biosensor from Molybdenite Semiconductor Outshines Graphene

Cutting fossil subsidies must to advance renewables: agency

Stealth wind turbines to become operational in France in 2015

EU calls for study of 2020 renewable energy targets

Go green and prosper, British government says

Sun-powered desalination for villages in India

X-ray imaging paves way for novel solar cell production

Breakthrough for Carbon Nanotube Solar Cells

New synthesis method may shape future of nanostructures, clean energy

Japan's first female industry chief visits Fukushima plant

Japan places political star at heart of nuclear revival

Australia, India sign long-awaited civil nuclear deal

DSIT Solutions of Israel helps with nuclear power plant security

Ethanol fireplaces: the underestimated risk

ACCESS II Confirms Jet Biofuel Burns Cleaner

Scientists create renewable fossil fuel alternative using bacteria

Scientists produce fuel from gut bacteria, sugar: study

China launches two satellites via one rocket

China Sends Life to Moon

Same-beam VLBI Tech monitors Chang'E-3 movement on moon

China Sends Remote-Sensing Satellite into Orbit

Carbon stored in soils more vulnerable to climate change than expected

UN climate chief says 'door closing' on warming fix

U.N. climate envoy sees lack of leadership in climate debate

A million people at risk as Somalia slides towards famine: UN

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.