Outside View: Arctic oil competition rages
Moscow (UPI) Oct 23, 2007
The Arctic is rapidly becoming a scene of "competition and conflict for access to natural resources."
This is how it is defined in A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower, a unified U.S. maritime strategy that explains the comprehensive role of the sea services in an era marked by increased globalization and change, presented on Oct. 17.
The U.S. Senate was also urged to approve U.S. participation in the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Taken together, this may point to Washington's resolve to stand up against Russia and other Arctic sates' claims to natural resources in that forbidding region.
Canadian Governor General Michaelle Jean, who opened the parliamentary session by speaking about new challenges, hinted at Russia's Arctic ambitions. She unveiled her government's plans for the year, which include the mapping of the seabed, patrolling the high latitudes by warplanes and combat aircraft, and increasing the number of rangers at the northern bases.
Some time before that, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced the construction of a deep-water seaport and a military training center in the Arctic to assert his country's sovereignty over the region.
The U.S. Coast Guard icebreaker Healy led Germany's Polarstern and French Tara schooner to the northern latitudes. Denmark and Sweden joined hands to send the Swedish Arctic-class icebreaker Oden to the area north of Greenland on an expedition named LOMROG (Lomonosov Ridge off Greenland), the ridge over which the Arctic countries are fighting.
But the British surprised everyone. Unable to lay claim to the North Pole, the United Kingdom has decided to assert its sovereignty over the South Pole.
The Guardian wrote on Oct. 17 that Britain "is planning to claim sovereign rights over a vast area of the remote seabed off Antarctica, more than 386,000 square miles of seabed" in "a quickening of the race for territory around the South Pole in the world's least explored continent." There are vast oil, gas and other mineral resources there, although their extraction "is not yet technically feasible."
Argentina hurried to reclaim her right to the Antarctic. On Oct. 19, Foreign Minister Jorge Taiana said his country would file the claim to "its" part of the southern continent and uphold its "sovereign rights" to the oceanic areas around several islands, including the Falklands.
Chile, Australia, New Zealand and other countries that believe they have "more entitlement to the potentially valuable territory" can be expected to speak up, too.
So far, the players have been acting within the framework of international law. But some of them now seem ready to rewrite it. The 1959 Antarctic Treaty, to which they are signatory, froze all territorial claims and the 1991 protocol to it prohibited the production of mineral resources in the region.
It was Russia that threw the first stone that provoked the avalanche of claims, debates and accusations. I am not referring to its claim to the ocean shelf and expeditions designed to assert it, because they are fully in line with the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. What irked everyone was the fuss raised by the media over the expedition to the North Pole organized by Artur Chilingarov, deputy speaker of the Parliament's lower house.
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Russia's expedition in August to plant a flag under the North Pole brought a new importance to the debate over the treaty.
Deputy Secretary of State John D. Negroponte wrote in his testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Sept. 27: "Recent Russian expeditions to the Arctic have focused attention on the resource-related benefits of being a party to the Convention."
The North Pole expedition of Chilingarov's team, which was not exceptionally important in terms of research, did a disservice to Russia. It has encouraged powerful rivals to lay their claims to the Arctic.
Famous Arctic researcher Alexander Gorodnitsky said recently in an interview with the Novaya Gazeta daily: "Our claims have awakened our American rivals' interest in the issue. Unlike us, they have much more funds and, more importantly, unique drilling and research equipment."
However, some experts say that Russia and the United States can agree on the issue, because Washington is now busy fighting Canada, which says it has full rights over those parts of the Northwest Passage linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans that pass through its territory, and that it can bar transit there. The United States believes the passage must remain free to all ships.
Russia has an ace up its sleeve. It is the disputed area of 19,305 square miles in the Bering Sea. In 1990, Eduard Shevardnadze, then the foreign minister of the Soviet Union, presented it to the United States. However, the Parliament did not ratify the transaction. Russia is most likely to use this bargaining chip to its advantage.
The immediate task, though, is to prepare for the next meeting of the U.N. Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. Chilingarov, who has been to the planet's poles by plane, helicopter, ship and submarine, is preparing for the meeting in his own way. He plans to go to the North Pole on a Russian dirigible. The ambitious feat could be applauded -- in a different situation.
(Maxim Krans is a political commentator for RIA Novosti. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)
Email This Article
Comment On This Article
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
Moscow (UPI) Oct 22, 2007
The success of the informal energy summit held by Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine in Vilnius, Lithuania, last week will be judged later, when the agreements reached there become reality. (United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement|