Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
  Energy News  

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Analysis: China and Turkmen energy

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by John C.K. Daly
Washington (UPI) Jan 4, 2008
Before the 1991 Soviet collapse, Russia dominated the economies of the other 14 republics. In the decade and a half since, Western companies have been angling to acquire a piece of the former Soviet Union's energy assets. In the last few years, however, China has become an increasingly important regional player, and in a nasty Christmas present for both Washington and Moscow, on Dec. 28 China National Petroleum Corp.'s subsidiary PetroChina announced it will invest $2.16 billion to underwrite construction of a planned Central Asia-China natural gas pipeline.

CNPC subsidiaries PetroChina and China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Corp. will each cover 50 percent of the project's costs. PetroChina and CNOGEDC established the Trans-Asia Gas Pipeline Company Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary, to construct the pipeline in cooperation with two state-owned development companies in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. The announcement follows on the heels of a July 2007 agreement with Turkmenistan under which CNPC, China's largest oil and gas company, agreed to contract terms to import 30 billion cubic meters of Turkmen gas annually through the proposed pipeline for 30 years. At the time, many analysts assumed the agreement was merely a negotiating tactic used by Turkmenistan's new President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov in his ongoing discussions with Russia's Gazprom for increased prices.

CNOGEDC is hardly a startup company lacking expertise; specializing in international oil and gas exploration and production, it operations are worldwide and include a presence in Algeria, Kazakhstan, Oman, Niger, Chad, Canada, Azerbaijan, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, China and Indonesia.

The agreement represents a stunning victory for Beijing, which has been scouring the globe looking for inexpensive and reliable energy to feed is booming economy. The Chinese government intends to raise its ratio of natural gas consumption by 2.5 percentage points to 5.3 percent by 2010; while this is a significant increase, it remains still far below the international average of 25 percent.

The agreement means that, despite a year of intense negotiation following the December 2006 death of Turkmen President Saparmurat Niyazov, Washington has essentially lost the race to gain a major foothold in the dormant but massive Turkmen natural gas sector, whose reserves are estimated to be the world's fourth or fifth largest.

The effect on Russia's Gazprom, which initially seemed to have cornered Turkmenistan's gas supplies, is less clear. Last September, Gazprom and Turkmenistan reached an agreement on gas prices and the amount of supplies for 2007-2009. The agreement allowed Gazprom to buy 50 billion cubic meters of Turkmen gas a year at $100 per 1,000 cubic meters, up from the previous price of $65. In November, subsequent agreements raised the price to $130 for January-June 2008, rising to $150 in the second half of the year.

Simply put, Gazprom desperately needs continued access to Turkmen gas. Europe now represents nearly 70 percent of Gazprom's total revenue. As Gazprom sells about two-thirds of Russia's 550 billion cubic meters of annual gas production in the domestic market, Turkmen production is critical both to meet domestic needs while meeting its European commitments.

BP has estimated Turkmen natural gas reserves at 2.86 trillion cubic meters. In 2006, Turkmenistan produced 62.2 billion cubic meters, placing it only behind Russia as the former Soviet Union's largest natural gas producer. With 2005 domestic consumption estimated at 17.07 billion cubic meters, more than two-thirds of Turkmen production is available for export.

While few further details of the agreement were released, China enters the Turkmen market with two major advantages over its competitors. Turkmenistan well remembers Russian dominance of its territory, which began in the 1860s and continued through the brutal socialist experiments of the Soviet era, where Turkmenistan was effectively reduced to the status of a conquered colony. China is free of any such imperial baggage.

As for the U.S. interest in developing Turkmen energy resources, proposals were frequently accompanied by hectoring lectures on both developing a free-market economy and human rights, both topics on which China maintained a diplomatic silence.

Furthermore, the China offer will undoubtedly include substantive assistance beyond the economic agreements. A look at Chinese policy in Africa, where Beijing has also engaged in a persistent search for energy assets, is instructive. Since 1956, China has provided educational assistance to 50 African nations, bringing 18,000 Africans to study in China on scholarships, and Beijing has trained more than 6,000 African civil servants while sending more than 15,000 Chinese doctors to 34 African countries. Such policies, far beyond mere trade ties, mean that since 2002 Chinese-African trade has tripled.

If there is a cautionary note to be sounded in this, it is how Turkmenistan will be able to balance its current commitments to Gazprom as well as meet future Chinese demand. Under current contracts, Gazprom exports 50 billion cubic meters of Turkmen gas annually, and without a massive increase in development, that commitment along with the CPNC accord would total 80 billion cubic meters of exports annually, a 20 percent increase over Turkmen current production of 62.2 billion cubic meters, not counting domestic consumption. But, as the new Chinese line will take years to complete, doubtless Gazprom and Beijing are hard at work on development packages to increase Turkmen production. The major loser in the last 12 months in the eastern Caspian has been Washington, and it will apparently remain so for the foreseeable future.

Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Powering The World in the 21st Century at

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

100-dollar crude is good and bad news for environment
Paris (AFP) Jan 3, 2008
Surging oil prices are a mixed blessing for the environment, experts say.

  • Babcock And Brown And BP Announce Full Commercial Operation Of One Of The Largest Wind Farms In The US
  • Analysis: Nigeria's Delta vows crackdown
  • Tri-State Biodiesel To Provide Biodiesel Fuel To NYC Mobile-Grocer FreshDirect
  • Earth Biofuels Subsidiary Receives Renewable LNG Output From Landfill Project

  • Outside View: Russia's Iran nuke role
  • Russia delivers more nuclear fuel to Iran: official
  • France could provide Egypt with nuclear help: Sarkozy
  • Iran nuclear plant to start in summer 2008: FM

  • New Model Revises Estimates Of Terrestrial Carbon Dioxide Uptake
  • A Breathable Earth
  • Researchers Find Origin Of Breathable Atmosphere Half A Billion Years Ago
  • Study Reveals Lakes A Major Source Of Prehistoric Methane

  • Carbon Sink Capacity In Northern Forests Reduced By Global Warming
  • Indonesia: President urges better forest management amid floods
  • Mexico planted 250 million trees in 2007: Calderon
  • Russian Christmas trees struggle to be merry

  • Australia looks to GM crops after scorching 2007
  • Fisheries Should Be Regarded As A Part Of The Maritime Environment
  • China's Agricultural Bank ready for bailout: officials
  • SmartGrow uses hair to grow food

  • CES unveils smart cars, robotic massages and more
  • Germany begins ban on polluting cars in city centres
  • California sues US for blocking car emissions rules
  • SAIC Motor merger with Nanjing Auto aimed at global markets

  • Antarctic ballooning hits milestone
  • Chinese major aircraft makers to build big planes: report
  • Dutch cops to ditch helicopters for airships in green bid: agency
  • China's rolls out first home-made commercial jet

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement