![]() |
Stuttgart, Germany (SPX) Aug 17, 2010 Coal-fired power stations burn lignite or, for the most part, coal imported from overseas. Solar cells need crystalline silicon that first needs to be extracted from quartz, an energy-intensive process. Therefore, when examining the climate compatibility of power generating plants, it makes sense to not restrict the analysis just to the operation of the plant. Instead, the total energy required should be considered across the entire service life of the plant, typically in excess of 30 years. Viewed against this benchmark, which type of power plant has the best environmental credentials? Answering this question requires the most comprehensive details on the energy consumption of a power plant: from the manufacture of its constituent parts, through its operational lifetime, to its decommissioning and disposal. This challenge was taken up by energy experts from the DLR Institute of Technical Thermodynamics in Stuttgart and from the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Heidelberg. Their results were published in June 2009 by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, on whose behalf the sustainability of different types of power plants was investigated.
Wind power and solar-thermal power offer high levels of energy efficiency Comparable figures were otherwise only achieved by solar-thermal power stations in sunny locations such as Morocco. Hydroelectric power stations need up to 13 months. Solar (photovoltaic) power stations in central Europe need to generate electricity for up to five years before they deliver an equivalent energy balance. However, modern thin-layer solar cells are able to produce energy more efficiently, cutting this timescale to just three years. By virtue of their operating principles, all power stations generating electricity from fossil fuels or uranium are incapable of achieving this type of energy balance. This is because they consume fuels with higher energy content than the electricity they generate. A perpetual motion machine offering efficiency ratings in excess of 100 percent simply does not exist.
The best solution lies in an intelligent mix "There is simply no such thing as one single 'best' technology for reliable electricity supply," says DLR researcher Franz Trieb, who also contributed to the BMU report on sustainable energy provision. In order to feed affordable electricity into the power grid with security of supply, a diverse mix of renewably-fuelled power stations would need to be employed.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links DLR Institute of Technical Thermodynamics Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
Energy Storage System Deals With Sudden Draws On The GridLeeds, UK (SPX) Aug 13, 2010 Time for a quick cuppa? When the final whistle blows, demand for electricity usually soars, causing a headache for energy companies. Researchers at the University of Leeds and the Chinese Academy of Sciences have now found a way to manage these short-lived draws on the electricity grid that could halve the fuel needed. The amount of electricity drawn from the national grid varies eno ... read more |
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |